Effects of interruptions of radiotherapy on outcomes of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors

null

Yanqun Dong

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Yanqun Dong , Tianyu Li , Thomas M. Churilla , Rosalia Viterbo , Mark L. Sobczak , Marc C. Smaldone , David Y. T. Chen , Robert G. Uzzo , Mark Hallman , Eric M. Horwitz

Organizations

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: To evaluate if interruptions of radiotherapy have any effect on outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Methods: We included men with localized PCa treated with definitive 3DCRT or IMRT of escalated dose (≥74 Gy in daily fraction of 2 Gy, or 70.2 Gy in daily fraction of 2.7 Gy) between 1989 and 2013. Men receiving androgen deprivation therapy, or follow up <1 year were excluded. The nontreatment day ratio (NTDR) was defined as the number of nontreatment days divided by the total elapsed days of therapy, to account for the difference in total RT dose and planned RT duration. NTDR was analyzed for each NCCN risk group. Results: A total of 1,796 men including 861 low risk, 821 intermediate risk, and 114 high risk were included, with median follow up of 53.5 m (range 12 to 185.8 m). The median NTDR was 31% (range 23.1%-71.2%), translating to approximately 2 breaks (each break represents a missed treatment that would be made up in the end) for an 8-week RT with 5 treatments per week. The 75th percentile of NTDR was 33.3%, translating to approximately 4 breaks, which was used as the cutoff to compare the outcomes with NTDR ≥33.3% vs <33.3%. There were no significant differences in freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), distant metastasis (DM), cancer-specific survival(CSS), or overall survival (OS) for men with NTDR ≥33.3% compared to NTDR<33.3% for each risk group (Table). Multivariable analyses including NTDR, age, race, Gleason score, T stage, and PSA were performed using the PHREG procedure. NTDR ≥33.3% was not significantly associated with increased hazard ratio for outcomes in each risk group compared to NTDR <33.3%. Conclusions: Interruptions of RT do not cause significant difference in outcomes in each risk group for men with localized PCa treated with definitive EBRT of escalated dose.

Comparison of FFBF, DM, CSS, and OS for men in each risk group with NTDR ≥33.3% vs. <33.3%.

At 5 yearsLowIntermediateHigh
FFBF(%)100 vs. 97.0, p=0.489.3 vs. 88.8, p=0.582.6 vs. 67.0, p=0.2
DM (%)0.5 vs. 0.5, p=0.23.1 vs 3.7, p=0.916.6 vs. 11.6, p=0.7
CSS (%)100 vs. 100, p=0.4100 vs. 98.4, p=0.8100 vs. 98.4, p=0.8
OS (%)94.5 vs. 97.5, p=0.190.3 vs. 90.2, p=0.191.5 vs. 95.4, p=0.4

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 37)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.37

Abstract #

37

Poster Bd #

B19

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Management outcomes of localized low-risk prostate cancer: A population-based study.

First Author: Shifeng S. Mao

First Author: Domenique Escobar

First Author: Lawrence Ivan Karsh