Improving quality of care and health outcomes for cancer survivors: Insights from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s (PCORI) cancer portfolio.

Authors

Neeraj Arora

Neeraj K. Arora

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC

Neeraj K. Arora , Christopher Gayer , William Lawrence , Vadim Gershteyn , Carly Parry , Kelly Dunham , Steven Clauser

Organizations

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: PCORI funds comparative effectiveness research (CER) which aims to produce evidence-based information to help people make informed health care decisions and improve outcomes that matter to patients. Cancer studies form one of the largest disease-specific PCORI-funded portfolios. Methods: We conducted a systematic analysis of PCORI’s cancer portfolio overall and of the subset of studies that focus on post-treatment survivorship. Results: As of June 2015, PCORI has funded 47 cancer projects totaling $125 million. Cancer studies account for 17% of PCORI’s dollar investment in CER research. These studies have focused on breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, cervical, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers as well as leukemia. A majority of PCORI-funded cancer studies are randomized trials (60% of studies, 72% of dollar investment). One-in-four studies address post-treatment survivorship (n = 12, $23 million). The 12 CER studies on post-treatment survivorship address a range of patient-centered issues. Four studies are evaluating different post-treatment surveillance approaches for breast (2 studies), colorectal, and lung cancer survivors respectively. Three studies are focusing on optimizing the care planning process for cancer survivors while another is evaluating the impact of an oncology medical home model on patient-centered outcomes. Four studies are addressing quality of life (QOL) issues, one is evaluating approaches for incorporating patient reported outcomes data in the clinical encounter, a second is evaluating a multi-component intervention to improve the QOL of cancer survivors, a third study is evaluating the comparative effectiveness of complementary therapies to treat symptoms, and another is addressing distress among caregivers of stem cell transplant survivors. Conclusions: PCORI-funded CER studies are rigorously evaluating the real world impact of a range of interventions aimed at optimizing the quality of care delivered to and outcomes experienced by cancer survivors. Our analysis of the cancer portfolio will inform future funding priorities aimed at improving patient-centered outcomes for cancer survivors.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Care Coordination and Financial Implications,Communication,Late- and Long-term Effects/Comorbidities,Health Promotion,Psychosocial Issues,Recurrence and Secondary Malignancies

Sub Track

Chronic Care Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 3S; abstr 10)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.3_suppl.10

Abstract #

10

Poster Bd #

C1

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Sarah A Birken

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Value-driven colorectal cancer survivorship through partnership with primary care.

First Author: Gloria Hui Jia Chan

First Author: Dalia Kagramanov