A clinical placement program for primary care professionals at a comprehensive cancer centre.

Authors

Michael Jefford

Michael Jefford

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia

Michael Jefford , Judy Evans , Linda Nolte , Amanda Piper , Liz Simkiss , Kathryn Whitfield

Organizations

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Health Services, Melbourne, Australia

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) and primary care nurses (PCNs) are likely to have a critical role in providing care for cancer survivors, especially following the end of cancer treatments. Generalists (PCPs and PCNs) express a need for information and training in post-treatment care. Based on models in other contexts a clinical placement program was developed at a comprehensive cancer centre to determine (1) its feasibility and acceptability, and (2) whether learning needs were met. Methods: Five clinical services (breast, lower gastro-intestinal, urology, skin and melanoma, late effects) participated. The program was advertised to generalists, intending to recruit 5 PCPs and 10 PCNs. Generalists received professional development points and partial reimbursement for lost income through a stipend. Pre-placement educational materials were provided. Participants were interviewed one-on-one pre and post-placement. The relevant human research ethics committee approved all aspects of the project. Results: The program exceeded recruitment goals: 16 PCPs, 12 PCNs and 9 oncologists participated. Generalists rated the placement highly: program learning outcomes entirely (63%) or partially (37%) met; personal learning needs entirely (70%) or partially met (30%); relevance to practice entirely (89%), partially (11%). Consistent themes from interviews: generalists would recommend the program to colleagues and could identify knowledge and skills transfer, however learning was largely by observation, rather than participation. Learning opportunities were skewed toward generalists, rather than oncologists. All participants showed enthusiasm to address the challenges of providing shared care for survivors. Conclusions: A clinical placement program for generalists is feasible and highly regarded. Participants described challenges to providing quality post-treatment shared care, but a willingness to address these. Future programs should consider the learning needs of cancer centre professionals.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Care Coordination and Financial Implications,Communication,Late- and Long-term Effects/Comorbidities,Health Promotion,Psychosocial Issues,Recurrence and Secondary Malignancies

Sub Track

Models of Care/Medical Homes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 3S; abstr 44)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.3_suppl.44

Abstract #

44

Poster Bd #

F6

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Lisa Mikesell

First Author: Eric Hess

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Racial/ethnic disparities in patient care experiences among prostate cancer survivors: A SEER-CAHPS study.

First Author: Ambrish Pandit

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Shift in survivorship care delivery.

First Author: Elizabeth Boutin McGrath