Efficacy and safety of rolapitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) over multiple cycles of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC, MEC).

Authors

Bernardo Rapoport

Bernardo Leon Rapoport

The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa

Bernardo Leon Rapoport, Lee Steven Schwartzberg, Martin Robert Chasen, Daniel Powers, Sujata Arora, Rudolph M. Navari, Ian D. Schnadig

Organizations

The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa, The West Clinic, Memphis, TN, Elizabeth Bruyere Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada, TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, Mishawaka, IN, Compass Oncology, Tualatin, OR

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The long-acting neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK-1 RA) rolapitant has demonstrated efficacy for CINV prevention in patients receiving HEC and MEC during Cycle 1. The efficacy and safety of rolapitant was examined during subsequent cycles 2–6 in a pooled analysis. Methods: In 4 double-blind, active-controlled studies, patients were randomized to oral rolapitant 180 mg or placebo 1–2 hours before chemotherapy. All patients received active control: 5HT3 receptor antagonist + oral dexamethasone. Patients completing Cycle 1 could receive the same anti-emetic treatment in subsequent cycles. On Days 6-8 of subsequent cycles, patients self-reported the incidence of emesis, or of nausea interfering with normal daily life following Day 1 of chemotherapy. Results: A greater proportion of patients on rolapitant than on active control reported no emesis or interfering nausea separately for each subsequent cycle. Results of individual studies and pooled analysis are shown in the Table. During cycles 2-6, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) was similar for rolapitant (5.5%) and control (6.8%). The most common treatment-related AEs were similar in both arms: constipation (rolapitant: 1.2%; control: 0.8%) and fatigue (rolapitant: 1.3%; control: 1.8%). Conclusions: Rolapitant was superior to active control in reducing CINV when administered over multiple cycles of moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy, with no increase in toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT00394966 - NCT01500213 - NCT01500226 - NCT01499849

CyclePatients with No Emesis or No Nausea Interfering
with Normal Daily Life % (N)*
Rolapitant 200mgActive Controlp-value**
275.7 (1006)70.1 (990)0.006
376.9 (834)67.9 (826)< 0.001
478.6 (682)70.9 (687)0.001
584.7 (378)78.2 (362)0.021
684.0 (318)80.1 (312)0.209

*mITT population **CMH test adjusted for study and gender

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Biologic Basis of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Evaluation and Assessment of Patient Symptoms and Quality of Life,Management/Prevention of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Integration and Delivery of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Psychosocial and Spiritual Care,Communication in Advanced Cancer

Sub Track

Treatment toxicity

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00394966 - NCT01500213 - NCT01500226 - NCT01499849

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 29S; abstr 210)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.210

Abstract #

210

Poster Bd #

F12

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts