Rapid intraoperative digital specimen tomosynthesis.

Authors

null

Cary Steven Kaufman

University of Washington Bellingham Regional Breast Center, Bellingham, WA

Cary Steven Kaufman , Valerie Behrndt , Laurie Hill , Rebecca Caro , Sid Nix , Karen Zacharias , Erik Evans , Carol Mahon , Karen Ness , Nancy Schnell

Organizations

University of Washington Bellingham Regional Breast Center, Bellingham, WA, Women's Diagnostic Center, Bellingham, WA, Bellingham Regional Breast Center, Bellingham, WA, Bellingham Ambulatory Surgery Center, Bellingham, WA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: About 75% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are not palpable and require image localization to remove the target lesion. Digital specimen mammography devices were developed to identify lumpectomy targets in the operating room. Despite the availability of two-dimensional digital specimen mammography (2D), the re-excision rate for lumpectomy remains significant. Specimen tomosynthesis (3D) may provide a more detailed image than standard 2D with consecutive image slices of the lumpectomy specimens for immediate review. Methods: A consecutive series of 28 breast cancer patients underwent intraoperative specimen imaging with both 2D and 3D imaging. Data recorded for each specimen on each device included 1) accuracy of identification of target lesion, 2) time required to produce comparable images, 3) ease of forwarding images via PACS to radiology, 4) predicted closest margin according to each specimen imaging device compared with final pathologic measured margin, and 5) ease of use by the surgeon and/or nurse. Results: The central focus of all 28 lesions were accurately identified with both 2D and 3D. After a short learning curve, details on the tomosynthesis images were seen not clearly shown on the 2D unit including some spiculated masses and architectural distortions. The location of closest margin was more specific with the 3D device due to “Z-axis” measurements which obtain the vertical distance of the target within the specimen. The spatial relationship of marginal calcifications or marking clips at the edge of the specimen provided by the 3D “Z-axis” was superior to the 2D orthogonal views. Although the time taken to obtain the 3D image was 74 seconds longer than a single image with the 2D device (106 vs. 32 seconds), this was equal to the time taken to obtain the two orthogonal images using the 2D device. Ease of use was equal for both 2D and 3D. Too few patients with positive margins were found to assess a difference in intraoperative positive margin prediction. Conclusions: Our initial experience with 3D tomosynthesis of lumpectomy specimens demonstrate clear images and increased information available for the breast surgeon. Research is planned to further examine the added value of high resolution tomosynthesis in breast surgery.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Risk Assessment, Prevention, Early Detection, Screening, and Local/Regional Therapy

Track

Local/Regional Therapy,Systemic Therapy,Risk Assessment, Prevention, Early Detection, and Screening

Sub Track

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 28S; abstr 59)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.28_suppl.59

Abstract #

59

Poster Bd #

H9

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Eun Kyung Park

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Mammography in women with sickle cell disease.

First Author: Marwah Wafa Farooqui

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Barriers, facilitators, and strategies for improving breast cancer screening in Ukraine.

First Author: Ali Dzhemiliev