Cost-sharing and financial burden for Medicare patients with newly diagnosed cancer.

Authors

null

Amol Narang

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD

Amol Narang , Lauren Nicholas

Organizations

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Proposals for reducing Medicare spending include measures that increase beneficiary cost-sharing by regulating the extent of supplemental insurance. However, the financial burden on patients of such policies is unclear, particularly for health shocks such as cancer. To address this question, we used the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to characterize the out-of-pocket (OOP) cost burden of newly diagnosed cancer and its relation with supplemental insurance. Methods: Medicare-eligible, community-dwelling HRS participants who did (N = 1409) or did not (N = 16,757) report a new cancer diagnosis from 2002-2012 were identified. Supplemental insurance was classified in order of increased cost-sharing as public (dual-eligible/VA), private (employer-sponsored/Medigap), or none (Medicare alone). OOP costs included hospital stays, doctor visits, outpatient surgery, prescription drugs, home health, dental, and special facilities. Financial burden was defined as OOP costs over per-capita household income. Multivariable quantile regression was used to assess the median and 90thpercentile (p90) of OOP costs and financial burden. Results: Newly diagnosed cancer patients experienced increased annual OOP costs (median: $2222 vs. $1791, p < 0.001; p90: $10,420 vs. $7807, p < 0.001) and financial burden (median: 9.0% of household income vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001; p90: 51.0% vs. 42.4%, p < 0.001). Supplemental insurance significantly affected cancer patients’ median financial burden (public: 3.3%, private: 9.9%, none: 16.6%, p < 0.001), which was magnified at the 90th percentile (public: 31.8%, private: 48.3%, none: 106.2%, p < 0.001). Importantly, financial burden at the 90thpercentile did not increase following a new cancer diagnosis for patients with public or private supplemental insurance, but significantly increased for patients with Medicare alone (p90: 106.2% vs. 58.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: More than 10% of newly diagnosed cancer patients with Medicare alone faced OOP costs greater than their income. Proposals to increase cost-sharing in the Medicare population should include provisions that protect patients from health shocks such as cancer, potentially though OOP cost limits or value-based exceptions.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 6622)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6622

Abstract #

6622

Poster Bd #

179

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Max Joseph Bouvette

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Trends of cancer drug cost increases and impact of generic and biosimilar drug launches.

First Author: Puneeth Indurlal

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Medicare coverage and cost-sharing for abiraterone following generic entry.

First Author: Arjun Gupta

Abstract

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Out-of-pocket cost trends for Medicare patients with newly diagnosed cancer.

First Author: Amol Narang