Patient-reported care coordination and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors

null

Sarah T. Hawley

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Sarah T. Hawley , Scott E. Regenbogen , Christine Marie Veenstra , Arden M. Morris

Organizations

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Care coordination is an essential component of effective, patient-centered cancer care. Yet little is known about the impact of patient reported care coordination on clinical outcomes, such as postoperative complications following high risk colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: In 2011-13, we surveyed Stage III colorectal cancer patients from Detroit and Georgia SEER registries 4-12 months after diagnosis. The primary outcome was self-report of a postoperative complication. We adapted a validated 6-item scale to assess perceived coordination across the overall continuum of cancer care (range 6-30). We used a separate 7-item scale to assess perceived care coordination specifically pre- and postoperatively (range 7-35). We compared the association between postoperative complications and overall and pre- /postoperative care coordination with chi-square tests. We assessed associations between complications and coordination in each phase of care in separate models, using logistic regression to control for age, race, education and insurance. Results: Among 1465 patients who returned surveys (RR = 66%), 23.1% reported a postoperative complication. Most respondents perceived their care coordination to be good overall (mean: 25.9, SD: 3.7), as well as pre- (mean: 29.5, SD 4.6) and postoperatively (mean: 30, SD 4.3). Older, minority and those with more comorbidities significantly more often perceived poor care coordination (P < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, postoperative complications were inversely associated with perceptions of good care coordination overall (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97) and with better pre- and post-operative coordination (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-.98; OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.91-0.97, respectively). Conclusions: Similar to other large studies, complications in this sample were common after colorectal cancer surgery. Reported care coordination was good for most patients, but less so for certain vulnerable subgroups. Better care coordination was associated with lower rates of surgical complications. Such findings indicate that better care coordination may lead to better clinical outcomes, however further work to confirm and expand these results is needed.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Outcomes and Quality of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 6516)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6516

Abstract #

6516

Poster Bd #

73

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Lin Wang

Abstract

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer undergoing surgery.

First Author: Helen Perry Knight

Abstract

2016 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Impact of infectious complications on long-term survival following colorectal cancer surgery.

First Author: Ali Mokdad