Predictors of cervical cancer screening among patients at an international medicine clinic – Seattle, WA.

Authors

null

Manoj Menon

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Manoj Menon , Angel Desai , Mahri Haider , Genji Terasaki

Organizations

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, University of Washington / Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Average-risk women between the ages of 21 and 65 are recommended to receive cervical cancer screening every 3 years. The mortality secondary to cervical cancer has decreased by over 75% in the U.S. since the routine implementation of the Pap test. However, cervical cancer continues to take a toll among women with limited access to care including ethnic minorities and immigrants – likely secondary to disparities in screening. The International Medicine Clinic (IMC) at Harborview Medical Center provides adult refugees and immigrants with access to primary health care services, including age-appropriate cancer screening. Here we document cervical cancer screening rates among women at the IMC and describe predictors of screening. Methods: We extracted data from our medical record on all women between the ages of 21 and 65 who presented for care at the IMC between 2/1/11 and 1/31/12. Patient age, language, and date of most recent cervical cancer screening were collected. The gender and level of clinical training of the provider were also abstracted. We utilized bivariate analyses to identify measures with p < 0.20 for inclusion in a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: We analyzed data from 565 women; 15 women had a prior hysterectomy and were excluded from this analysis. The median age was 52 years (IQR 18). Somali was the most common language (25.3%) spoken followed by Amharic (13.5%), Vietnamese (12.5%), Khmer (10.0%), Tigrinya (9.1%), English (7.1%), and Spanish (6.4%). Cervical cancer screening was performed on 346 (62.9%) of women in the previous 3 years. The provider was female for 263 patients (47.8%). The majority of patients were seen by an attending physician (452; 82.2%). In multivariate analyses, younger patients (p < .001) and patients seen by female providers (p = .05) were more likely to have received cervical cancer screening. Patients who spoke either Somali (p = .02) or Tigrinya (p = .03) were less likely to receive cervical cancer screening (p = .03). Conclusions: The percentage of women who had not been screened for cervical cancer in our clinic is high. In order to increase utilization of cervical cancer screening, a better understanding of both patient and provider factors is necessary.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Outcomes and Quality of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr e17632)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e17632

Abstract #

e17632

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jane J. Chen

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Racial and ethnic disparities in the cervical cancer screening cascade in three U.S. health care settings.

First Author: Jennifer C. Spencer

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Quality improvement of breast and cervical cancer screening satisfaction rate at a resident-led clinic.

First Author: Eunbee Cho

First Author: Nicole Ann Gay