Medical Oncologists’ and Surgeons’ approaches to communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.

Authors

null

Aaron Sabolch

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Aaron Sabolch , Brian Zikmund-Fisher , Nancy K. Janz , Sarah T. Hawley , Kent A. Griffith , Reshma Jagsi

Organizations

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Risk of breast cancer recurrence can be estimated with tools such as Adjuvant! Online, but little is known about how medical oncologists and surgeons use such tools or communicate risk information to patients. Methods: In 2012, we surveyed 750 medical oncologists and 750 surgeons identified using the AMA Physician Masterfile (a comprehensive physician list not limited to AMA members). Using a vignette, we evaluated risk communication practices (discussing risk using descriptive words, discussing risk using numbers, using online calculators, providing copy of risk estimates) and analyzed correlates of specific approaches in a logistic regression model that included physician (e.g., gender, specialty) and practice characteristics (number of breast cancer patients seen in past year, multidisciplinarity [i..e., offering same-day multi-specialty appointments]). Results: 498 surgeons and 398 medical oncologists responded (60.5% response rate). We excluded 130 who did not see breast cancer pts. Respondents averaged 19 years in practice, 79% were male, 74% saw > 10 breast cancer pts/yr, and 45% offered same-day multi-specialty appointments. 84% of medical oncologists and 85% of surgeons reported discussing recurrence risk using terms such as “high risk.” Medical oncologists were much more likely than surgeons to use an online risk calculator (76 vs 24%, p < .001), provide numerical risk estimates (88 vs 47%, p < .001), and provide a copy of risk estimates (71 vs 17%, p < .001). Specialty (p < .01) and multidisciplinarity (p < .01) were the only significant independent correlates of communication practices. After controlling for specialty, clinicians offering same-day multi-specialty appointments were more likely to use online calculators (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 - 2.3) and discuss numerical risk estimates (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 - 2.5). Conclusions: Most medical oncologists use online calculators and numerical estimates to communicate recurrence risk to breast cancer patients; fewer surgeons do so. Patients who do not see a medical oncologist until after surgery may make critical treatment decisions (including whether to remove the contralateral breast) without full understanding of relevant risk information.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Care Delivery/Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 6543)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6543

Abstract #

6543

Poster Bd #

100

Abstract Disclosures