Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Larissa Meyer

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Larissa Meyer , Angel Cronin , Charlotte C. Sun , Michael A. Bookman , Robert Allen Burger , Mihaela C. Cristea , Jennifer J. Griggs , Charles F. Levenback , Gina Mantia-Smaldone , Ursula Matulonis , Joyce C. Niland , David M. O'Malley , Alexi A. Wright

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, City of Hope, Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, Duarte, CA, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Dana-Farber Cancer Inst, Boston, MA, City of Hope Natl Medcl Ctr, Duarte, CA, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: In 2010, a randomized trial demonstrated no difference in survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or primary debulking surgery (PDS). We examined the use and effectiveness of NAC in clinical practice over time. Methods: Prospective cohort study of women with stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer treated at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) institutions between 2003-2012. We examined the use (N = 961) and outcomes (N = 414) of NAC + interval debulking (IDS) +/- adjuvant chemotherapy versus PDS +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to balance observed confounders between groups in the outcomes analyses and trial participants excluded. Cox regression, logistic regression, and Fisher’s exact test were used to examine overall survival, residual disease, and perioperative morbidity in the matched sample. Results: Use of NAC+IDS increased from 0-39% between 2003-2010, and rose to 53% (stage IIIC) and 58% (stage IV) in 2011-2012. Adoption of NAC+IDS varied by institution from 0%-29% (stage IIIC, P < 0.001) and 13%-48% (stage IV, P = 0.04). After propensity-score adjustment, NAC+IDS was associated with lower survival in stage IIIC disease, compared with PDS (median 31 vs. 50 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.24), and comparable survival in stage IV disease (median 43 vs. 32 months, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.22). NAC+IDS was associated with higher odds of an R0 resection [odds ratio (OR): 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.98, stage IIIC; OR 4.03, 95% CI 1.73-9.38, Stage IV), and fewer ostomies (adjusted rates: 3% vs. 9%, P = 0.11, stage IIIC and 3% vs. 11%, P = 0.06, stage IV). Readmission rates were lower in NAC+IDS, compared with PDS (adjusted rates: 2% vs. 16% for stage IIIC and 2% vs 15% for stage IV, both P < 0.001). Conclusions: NAC+IDS use increased significantly at NCCN centers between 2003-2012. In this observational study, overall survival was comparable in patients with stage IV disease, and NAC+IDS was associated with lower ostomy rates and perioperative morbidity in stage IIIC and IV disease. NAC+IDS was associated with decreased survival in patients with stage IIIC disease, however additional selection bias may remain after propensity-score matching.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 5563)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.5563

Abstract #

5563

Poster Bd #

121

Abstract Disclosures