Phase I study of ganetespib (G), capecitabine (C), and radiation (RT) in rectal cancer.

Authors

Bassel El-Rayes

Bassel F. El-Rayes

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Bassel F. El-Rayes , Charles A. Staley , Roberto Diaz , Patrick S. Sullivan , Walid Labib Shaib , Jerome Carl Landry

Organizations

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Emory Univ and Clinic, Atlanta, GA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Ganetespib (G) is a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor . Preclinical data show that G is a potent radiosensitizer for rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to determine the recommended phase II dose of G when combined with capecitabine (C) and radiation (RT) in resectable rectal cancer. Methods: Patients (pts) with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma with distal border within 12 cm of anal verge, no prior therapy, and adequate organ functions, were eligible. A 3+3 dose escalation design was used. Pts received 2 weeks of G at 150 mg/m2 I.V. on days -14, -11, -7, and -4. Pre and post-treatment tumor biopsies were obtained. C (825 mg/m2) and RT (50.4Gy) were administered 5 days per week for 5.5 to 6 weeks starting day 1. G was administered on days 1, 8, 15, 29 and 36. G dose levels were 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic sampling for C and G were performed on days 1, 2, 15, and 16. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as the occurrence of any treatment related: grade (gr) 4 hematologic or gr 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicities, gr 3 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea lasting > 4 days, any interruption of RT > 10 days, more than 2 interruptions in RT, delay in completion of RT for > 14 days, or inability to deliver more than 85% of planned RT dose. Results: 16 pts were enrolled in the study; 1 pt received only day-14 and was not .evaluable for toxicity. Evaluable pts had a median age of 61 yrs, 7 females, and endoscopic stage: T3N0 (6 pts), T3N1 (6), T3N2 (2), T4N1 (1); 3 pts were treated on each dose level, 2 pts on dose level 4 required dose reduction, so we enrolled 3 additional pts on level 3 (100 mg/m2). One DLT was observed (gr 3 diarrhea for more than 4 days). Other toxicities on the study were: diarrhea gr 3 (3 pts), gr 2 (6), gr 1 (2), radiation dermatitis gr 2 (9), gr 1 (3), fatigue gr 2 (5), gr 1 (4), hand foot syndrome gr 2 (1), mucositis gr 1 (2), and nausea/vomiting gr 2 (2), gr 1 (8). 12 pts have completed surgical resection (2 APR and 10 LAR). Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 25% (3/12) and 2 pts had residual tumors less than 1 cm (pT1N0). Six of 9 (67%) pts had clearing of lymph nodes disease on pathologic specimen. Conclusions: G can be safely combined with standard C and RT in the neoadjuvant setting in rectal cancer. Preliminary data on activity appear promising. Clinical trial information: 01554969.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

01554969

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 3596)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.3596

Abstract #

3596

Poster Bd #

89

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts