Variations in measured ER, PR, and HER2 status in synchronous and asynchronous paired breast cancer (BC) tumors.

Authors

null

Clayton Yates

Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL

Clayton Yates , Sherri Z. Millis , Sandeep K. Reddy , Zoran Gatalica , Joyce O'Shaughnessy , Windy Marie Dean-Colomb

Organizations

Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, Caris Life SCoence, Los Alamitos, CA, Baylor Sammons Cancer Ctr US Onc, Dallas, TX, Lousiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: That tumor heterogeneity exists and evolves over time is well appreciated but how often to biopsy patients’ metastatic BC is not well established. Methods: Immunohistochemical (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), and HER2 in 337 cases with > 1 asynchronous primary/metastatic BC molecular profiles and in 40 cases with > 1 synchronous molecular profiles was performed at a single institution. We evaluated differences in ER, PR and HER2 status in same or contralateral breast, and in primary vs. locally recurrent or metastatic BC’s. Results: We identified a change in ER or HER2 status in 8 (31%) synchronous BCs and in 55 (16%) primary/recurrent BCs, including in biopsies of distinct tumor foci within the same breast or metastatic organ site. Of the 8 synchronous bilateral primary BC’s, 4 (50%) had discordant ER results (ER, PR, and HER2 negative [TN] vs. ER+); 5 of 18 (28%) with two or more metastatic foci tested within the same organ had discordant ER results; 23% of BCs with biopsies of different organ sites had discordant ER results. Of the 55 paired primary/metastatic BCs, 15% of the discordant findings were in cases with biopsies from two different metastatic sites, 19% were in cases with one metastatic and one primary or local recurrent biopsy, and 23% were from 2 primary biopsies or from primary and locally recurrent disease. Discordance was bidirectional from either TN to ER+ or ER+ to TN, and independent of discordance in HER2. Conclusions: Standard systemic treatment of BC relies on reliable assessment by IHC analysis of ER, PR, and HER2. Within a patient, ER and HER2 status are not always concordant between lesions within the same breast, between bilateral BCs, and between distinct foci in a metastatic organ site. Patients are at risk of not being treated for the most clinically important foci of BC if the biopsy(s) obtained are not representative of the more aggressive areas of disease. Profiling should be performed on multiple BC samples both at diagnosis and at each time of recurrence/progression in the cancer continuum, to more accurately reflect the tumor profile at the time of treatment.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 567)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.567

Abstract #

567

Poster Bd #

55

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: David H Aggen

First Author: Elizabeth Walsh

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Evolution of HER2 scores after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer.

First Author: Esther G Chong