A molecular and clinico-pathological model for predicting abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) efficacy in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Authors

Manish Kohli

Manish Kohli

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Rochester, MN

Manish Kohli , Rui Qin , Liguo Wang , Hugues Sicotte , Rachel Carlson , Winston Tan , Rafael E. Jimenez , Liewei Wang , Jeanette Eckel-Passow , Brian Addis Costello , Henry C. Pitot , Fernando Quevedo , Roxana Stefania Dronca , Kevin Wu , Timothy Jerome Moynihan , Thai Huu Ho , Alan Haruo Bryce , Thomas D Atwell , Brendan P McMenomy , Scott Dehm

Organizations

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Rochester, MN, Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, Jacksonville, FL, Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, Scottsdale, AZ, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Research Funding

Other

Background: There are no known markers for predicting AA/P efficacy in chemo-naïve mCRPC stage. We explored a model for predicting the 12-week efficacy outcome after initiation of AA/P in a prospective clinical trial (NCT# 01953640). Methods: mCRPC patients initiating AA/P underwent biopsy of metastases at baseline (pre AA/P) and at week 12. Somatic whole exome DNA sequencing; gene expression for AR full length (ARFL) and splice variants (ARVs) was performed of baseline metastases. Composite progression on AA/P at week 12, (primary endpoint) was evaluated with PSA, RECIST, bone scan and symptoms (based on PCWG2 criteria). Candidate molecular factors (RNA expression of ARFL, ARV3, ARV7, ARV9, ARV23, ARV45, Chromogranin-A (CGA)) were explored in a multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard Regression (CPHR) model. Additionally, PSA/testosterone levels, Gleason Score (GS:2-6;7;8-10) at initial diagnosis; time from starting hormone therapy to mCRPC stage (years), serum CGA levels were also included. A final CPHR model fitted only those factors which exceeded an entry threshold in univariate analysis or were considered clinically relevant. Results: Between 6/2013 and 11/2014, 56/70 patients enrolled had disease assessed at the 12-week time point. The CPHR model includes 56 patients with complete sequencing and 12 week clinical outcomes. The median follow up for the cohort was 170 days (41-502 days). Progression at 12-weeks was observed in 23/56 patients. The final CPHR model included baseline expression of ARV45 (HR = 13.107, p-value = 0.017); CGA levels (HR = 0.998, p-value = 0.004); time from hormone therapy to mCRPC stage (HR = 0.782, p-value = 0.008); GS at initial diagnosis (HR = 0.004, p-value < 0.001 for GS group 7 and HR = 0.008 p-value < 0.001 for GS group 8-10) and ARFL, ARV3, ARV7, ARV9, ARV23. A C-statistic for the model was observed at 0.76 with an adjusted R2 of 0.47 (likelihood ratio p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: Clinical prediction rules are needed for developing precision medicine in mCRPC. An initial attempt to incorporate molecular and clinico-pathological factors appears feasible. Evaluation for model stability remains ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT# 01953640.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT# 01953640

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 5056)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.5056

Abstract #

5056

Poster Bd #

50

Abstract Disclosures