Protein activation mapping and exploratory predictive markers for pCR in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neratinib in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL.

Authors

null

Julia Dianne Wulfkuhle

George Mason Univ, Columbia, MD

Julia Dianne Wulfkuhle , Christina Yau , Denise M Wolf , Rosa Isela Gallagher , Jianghong Deng , Lamorna Brown Swigart , Gillian Hirst , Minetta C. Liu , John W. Park , Laura Esserman , Donald A. Berry , Laura van't Veer , Emanuel Petricoin III

Organizations

George Mason Univ, Columbia, MD, Buck Institute for Age Research, Novato, CA, UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: In the I-SPY 2 trial, the pan-ERBB inhibitor, neratinib (N) arm was open to all HR/HER2 subtypes but graduated in the HR-/HER2+ signature. Exploratory analysis of protein signaling was performed to identify biomarker candidates correlated with pCR in the TN population. We evaluated 110 key signaling proteins using reverse phase protein microarray (RPPA) data from pre-treatment LCM purified tumor epithelium. Methods: Of 59 TN patients, 49 (N: 30, concurrent controls: 19) had RPPA and pCR data. RPPA data was correlated to pCR in both the treated and untreated patients using parametric (t-test) or non-parametric (Wilcoxon) statistical analysis, depending on data distribution. Only analytes whose levels were associated with response in the N but not the control arm were selected for further analysis. Markers are analyzed individually; p-values are descriptive and were not corrected for multiple comparisons. ROC analysis identified an optimal cut point and pCR rates of biomarker positive patients were assessed using that cut point. Results: Out of 110 analytes analyzed, only activation of HER2 Y1248, p = 0.03; EGFR Y1173, p = 0.009; were found to be positive predictors of pCR, and 3 proteins, TIE2 Y992, p = 0.02; LC3B, p = 0.02, and A-RAF S299, p = 0.0008, were found to be negative predictors of pCR. pCR rates in the biomarker positive group of 62.5% (10/16), 66% (11/16), 55%(10,/18), 67% (12/17). 61% (11/18) were determined for phospho- HER2, EGFR, TIE2, A-RAF and total LC3B, respectively, compared to a pCR rate of 40% ffor the IHC/FISH-based TN subgroup where RPPA data were available. Conclusions: Our sample size is too small to draw definitive conclusions. However, activation of HER2-EGFR in HER2- tumors may identify patients who respond to N. Low levels of activated A-RAF and LC3B also correlated with response. The results imply that there is a subset TN patients that paradoxically exhibit HER family signaling activation and may achieve clinical benefit with N. These findings merit future consideration as we develop trials for patients with suboptimal response to neoadjuvant therapy where biomarkers could be used as the basis for treatment reassignment. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01042379

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 1085)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.1085

Abstract #

1085

Poster Bd #

199

Abstract Disclosures