Results of a randomized, global, multi-center study of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) plus veliparib or placebo in patients (pts) with brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors

null

Pierre Chabot

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada

Pierre Chabot , Jeong-Seon Ryu , Vera Gorbunova , Cristobal Belda , David Ball , Ebenezer A. Kio , Minesh Mehta , Katherine Papp , Qin Qin , Jane Qian , Kyle D. Holen , Vincent L. Giranda , John H. Suh

Organizations

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea, N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital MN Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia, Goshen Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, IN, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Veliparib (V) is a potent, orally bioavailable PARP inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier. Phase 2 trials in BRCA pts as monotherapy or in unselected pts in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy have demonstrated evidence of efficacy. V plus radiation has shown promising efficacy in preclinical models and clinically in combination with WBRT. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to WBRT plus V 50 mg BID (V50), V 200 mg BID (V200), or P BID. Treatment began within 28 days (d) of diagnosis. Pts received 30 Gray WBRT in 10 fractions. V50, V200, or P BID was self-administered starting on d 1 of WBRT and continuing until 1 d after completion. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Survival was assessed at 2 month (m) intervals for 6 m then every 3 m (≥36 m). Pts who received ≥1 dose were included in the safety analyses; AEs were compared across arms using Fisher’s exact test. Results: 307 pts were randomized. OS, intracranial response rate, and time to clinical or radiographic progression were not statistically significantly different between any of the V arms and the P arm. There were no differences in all grade adverse drug reactions (ADRs) across arms and a modest improvement in grade 3/4 AEs in the V arms. Conclusions: Although preclinical and early clinical data suggested that V might synergize with radiotherapy, there was no difference in multiple study endpoints between V50 or V200 and P in this setting. Safety parameters observed in the V arms were generally similar to the P arm; no new safety signals of V were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT01657799

P
N=102a
V50
N=103
V200
N=102
Median age, years606062
Sex, n Male566166
Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA),
n ≤2.5
919192
Median OS, d (95% CI)185
(137–251)
209
(169–264)
209
( 138–255)
Objective Response Rate, %41.236.942.2
Median time to clinical BM progression
per event review board, d (95%CI)
348
(216–NR)
286
(192–NR)
255
(204–342)
Median time to radiographic
BM progression per central
imaging center, d (95%CI)
259
(184–NR)
226
(147–360)
224
(137–358)
All ADRs, %373740
Gr 3/4 AEs, %4328 (p=.040)26 (p=.012)

a1 not dosed or included in the safety analysis; NR, not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01657799

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 2021)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2021

Abstract #

2021

Poster Bd #

10

Abstract Disclosures