Prevalence and outcomes of patients (pts) with EGFR S492R ectodomain mutations in ASPECCT: Panitumumab (pmab) vs cetuximab (cmab) in pts with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Authors

Timothy Price

Timothy Jay Price

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Timothy Jay Price , Kathryn Newhall , Marc Peeters , Tae Won Kim , Jin Li , Stefano Cascinu , Paul Ruff , Attili Venkatasatya Suresh , Anne L. Thomas , Sergei Tjulandin , Michael Boedigheimer , Kathy Zhang , Roger Sidhu , Swaminathan Murugappan

Organizations

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AO Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, India, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, Global Biostatistical Science, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Mutations resistant to anti-EGFR treatment (tx), beyond those in RAS, have been reported and include EGFR S492R. We report results for pts with EGFR S492R mutations in the phase 3 ASPECCT trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive pmab or cmab. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. EGFR S492R was evaluated by digital droplet PCR in plasma samples collected pre-tx and post-tx (safety follow-up 4 wks after the last dose). Results from the primary analysis were analyzed by EGFR S492 status. Results: Of 999 pts randomized and treated, post-tx samples were available for EGFR S492 assessment from 53% of pts (261/496) in the pmab arm and 57% of pts (285/503) in the cmab arm. EGFR S492R was detected in 1% of pts in the pmab arm and 16% of pts in the cmab arm in post-tx samples. EGFR S492R was not detected in pre-tx samples. Results are shown (table). Conclusions: In an exploratory analysis of pts with available samples from ASPECCT, 16% of pts in the cmab arm and 1% of pts in the pmab developed EGFR S492R mutations. Pts with EGFR S492R in the cmab arm had longer tx duration before progressive disease (PD) and appeared to have worse OS vs pts with wild-type S492 in the cmab arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01001377

EGFR S492
Evaluable Pts
Pmab
(n = 262)
Cmab
(n = 284)
HR (95% CI)
Median OS - mos (95% CI)12.5 (11.2 – 14.3)12.8 (11.7 – 14.7)1.03 (0.85 – 1.25)
Median PFS - mos (95% CI)4.8 (4.4 – 4.9)4.8 (4.7 – 5.0)1.10 (0.92 – 1.30)
ORR - % (95% CI)28.2 (22.9 – 34.1)25.4 (20.4 – 30.8)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
1.15 (0.77 – 1.72)
Tx duration - wks
(range)
22 (2-70)21 (1-94)
Tx discontinuation
due to PD (%)
9494
EGFR S492
Evaluable Pts -
Cmab Arm
Cmab EGFR
S492R (mutant)
(n = 46)
Cmab EGFR
S492
(n = 238)
HR (95% CI)
Median OS - mos (95% CI)11.9 (10.7 – 14.0)13.8 (11.5 – 15.4)1.75 (1.23 – 2.50)
Median PFS - mos (95% CI)5.1 (4.9 – 6.7)4.7 (3.2 – 4.9)0.68 (0.10 – 4.92)
ORR - % (95% CI)39.1 (25.1 – 54.6)22.7 (17.5 – 28.5)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
2.24 (1.07–4.60)
Tx duration - wks
(range)
22 (6-61)15 (1-94)
Tx discontinuation
due to PD (%)
9894

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01001377

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr e14623)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e14623

Abstract #

e14623

Abstract Disclosures