A subgroup with improved overall survival from the phase 2 IMPACT study: Maintenance therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with the TLR-9 agonist MGN1703.

Authors

null

Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild

Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild , Dirk Arnold , Hans-Georg Kopp , Frank Mayer , Dieter Nitsche , Jan Kuhlmann , Reinhard Ziebermayr , Johannes Andel , Alfredo Zurlo , Burghardt Wittig , Werner Scheithauer , Hans-Joachim Schmoll , Hendrik Kroening

Organizations

Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg, Marburg, Germany, Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Freiburg, Germany, University Hospital, Medical Center II, Tuebingen, Germany, Barmherziger Schwestern Linz, Linz, Austria, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, Academic Teaching Hospital, Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria, Landeskrankenhaus Steyr, Steyr, Austria, Mologen AG, Berlin, Germany, Foundation Institute Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Martin Luther University, Division Clinical Oncology, University Hospital, Halle, Germany, Schwerpunktpraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Magdeburg, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 IMPACT trial aimed to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and immunological effects of the potent TLR9 agonist MGN1703, given at the dose of 60 mg subcutaneously twice weekly as switch maintenance after disease control due to first-line induction chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: After randomization of 59 patients the trial was prematurely closed and final analysis showed a superior effect of MGN1703 compared to placebo with hazard ratios (HR) for the primary endpoint PFS on maintenance of 0.55 (p = 0.041) and 0.56 (p = 0.070) by local investigator assessment or independent radiological review, respectively. Exploratory PFS analyses of pretreatment characteristics identified patients with normalized CEA, objective response, and the presence of activated NKT cells at the end of induction chemotherapy to benefit the most from maintenance with MGN1703. The impact of these factors on the secondary endpoint overall survival (OS) is presented here. Results: OS data were not mature at time of final study analysis, since only 35% of MGN1703 patients and 50% of placebo patients had an event. The HR for OS of the whole study population was 0.63 (median 22.6 vs. 15.1 months). The subgroup of patients randomized into the study with confirmed RECIST response had a HR of 0.40 (median 24.5 vs. 15.1 months), suggesting this may be the population with greater benefit. HR for patients with normalized CEA or with activated NKT cells were 0.69 and 0.43, respectively. Based on this evidence, patients with mCRC and objective response after standard induction therapy are randomized in the phase 3 IMPALA study to standard treatment or switch maintenance with MGN1703. CEA and activated NKT cells are stratification factors for the study and will be prospectively assessed. Conclusions: The pretreatment characteristics predictive of a PFS benefit in the IMPACT study seem to retain their value also in exploratory analyses for OS. This information has been used to design the phase 3 IMPALA study, currently recruiting patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01208194

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Immunotherapy

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Immunotherapy and Biologic Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01208194

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 3049)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.3049

Abstract #

3049

Poster Bd #

375

Abstract Disclosures