A randomized phase II study of TS-1 plus cisplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): WJOG 5008L.

Authors

null

Takashi Seto

National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan

Takashi Seto , Tomonari Sasaki , Takeharu Yamanaka , Naonobu Kunitake , Junichi Shimizu , Takeshi Kodaira , Makoto Nishio , Takuyo Kozuka , Toshiaki Takahashi , Hideyuki Harada , Naruo Yoshimura , Shinichi Tsutsumi , Hiromoto Kitajima , Masaaki Kataoka , Kazuhiko Nakagawa , Yasumasa Nishimura , Yoichi Nakanishi

Organizations

National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy is the standard treatments for LA-NSCLC. Thistrial evaluated two experimental regimens of chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy. Methods: Eligible patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, 20 to 74 years of age, and ECOG PS of 0–1 were randomized to either Arm SP, S-1 (40 mg/m2/dose per oral, b.i.d, on days 1-14) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) repeated every 4 weeks or Arm VP, vinorelbine ( 20mg/m2 on day 1, 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2on day) repeated every 4 weeks with early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy at 2 Gy per daily fraction. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 2-year (2yr-OS). A pick-the-winner design was used to identify the treatment regimen most likely to be superior. The planned sample size was 55 patients per arm, assuming in each arm that the null hypothesis for 2yr- OS was 50% versus an alternative hypothesis for 65% with one-sided alpha of 0.10 and power of 80% (Study ID: UMIN000002420). Results: One hundred eleven patients were registered between Sep 2009 and Sep 2012. Of 108 patients for efficacy analysis, the 2yr-OS was 76% (95% CI, 62-85%) for SP and 69% (95% CI, 54-79%) for VP. The hazard ratio (HR) of death between the two arms was 0.85 (0.48-1.49). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.8 months for SP and 12.3 months for VP with a HR of 0.92 (0.58-1.44). 80% and 48% of patients completed the protocol treatment in SP and VP, respectively. Common grade 3-4 toxicities in SP v VP were neutropenia 33.3% v 75.9%, platelets 9.3% v 3.7%, hemoglobin 1.9% v 27.8%, febrile neutropenia 9.3% v 16.7%, diarrhea 5.6% v 0%. There were 4 and 5 treatment-related deaths in SP and VP, respectively. Conclusions: Both arms rejected the null hypothesis for 2yr-OS. In this study Arm SP was declared the winner in terms of 2yr-OS, PFS, treatment completion, and toxicity. Clinical trial information: 000002420.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

000002420

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 7512)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.7512

Abstract #

7512

Poster Bd #

259

Abstract Disclosures