Nab paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after failure of folfirinox: Results of an AGEO multicenter prospective cohort.

Authors

null

Alix Portal

Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France

Alix Portal , Simon Pernot , Claire Arbaud , David Tougeron , Anne Thirot-Bidault , Christelle De La Fouchardiere , Pascal Hammel , Thierry Lecomte , Johann Dreanic , Romain Coriat , Jean Baptiste Bachet , Olivier Dubreuil , Lysiane Marthey , Laetitia Dahan , Jean-Louis Legoux , Christophe Locher , Céline Lepère , Philippe Rougier , Franck Bonnetain , Julien Taieb

Organizations

Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France, Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit and Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, Besançon, France, Medical Oncology Department, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Bicêtre Hospital, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France, Centre Hospitalier Trousseau, Tours, France, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, Unité D'oncologie Médicale, St. Jacques, Paris, France, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France, Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France, La Timone, Marseille University Hospital, Marseille, France, Orleans Regional Hospital, Orleans, France, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Meaux Hospital, Meaux, France, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Both Folfirinox and Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine showed a benefit in terms of survival in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA) when compared to gemcitabine. It could be of interest to use them consecutively, knowing that there is currently no standard for 2nd line treatments for MPA and that median Progression free survival (PFS) is consistently less than 4 months in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel after Folfirinox failure in MPA. Methods: From February 2013 to July 2014, all consecutive patients (pts) from 12 French centers treated by Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine for a histologically proven MPA after failure of Folfirinox were prospectively recorded. Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine was delivered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks, as previously reported, until disease progression, patient refusal or unacceptable toxicity Results: Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine was administered to 57 pts. They received a median number of 4 cycles (1–12). Disease control rate was 58% (n = 33) with a 18.5 % (n = 18) objective response rate (RECIST). Within the whole cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.2-9.7) and median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI : 3.2-6.2). Since the start date of first line chemotherapy with Folfirinox, median OS was 18 months (95% CI: 16-21). No toxic death occured. Grade 3–4 toxicities were reported in 40% of patients and were neutropenia (12%), neurotoxicity (12%), asthenia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (8%). Conclusions: With median PFS and OS of respectively 5.1 and 8.8 months Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine seems promising with a manageable toxicity profile after folfirinox failure, in selected patients able to receive second line treatment for a MPA. These promising results have now to be confirmed in a phase III randomized trial.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 4123)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.4123

Abstract #

4123

Poster Bd #

235

Abstract Disclosures