Targeting c-Met overexpression for overcoming acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs in NSCLC.

Authors

null

Lanying Gou Jr.

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China

Lanying Gou Jr., Yi-Long Wu , Jinji Yang , Xuchao Zhang

Organizations

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital (GGH) and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: c-Met amplification and T790M are both recognized as the common molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance (AR) to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) in advanced NSCLC. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients with AR to EGFR TKIs were detected for c-Met overexpression by immunohistochemistry ≥ 50% tumor cells with moderate to high intensity staining were defined as c-Met positive. The statuses of EGFR, ALK, KRAS and ROS1 were tested. c-Met, p-Met, EGFR, p-EGFR, ERBB3, p-ERBB3, AKT, p-AKT, MAPK, p-MAPK, which were important markers in MET and EGFR signal pathway ,were tested by IHC. Results: From January 2013 to January 2015, 126 advanced NSCLC patients with AR to gefitinib or erlotinib were enrolled prospectively. The frequency of c-Met overexpression was 28.6% (36/126), c-Met overexpression+T790M 13.5% (17/126), T790M 24.6% (31/126), SCLC or squamous cell transformation 1.6% (2/126), KRAS mutation 0.8% (1/126), ROS1 fusion 0.8% (1/126) ,ALK fusion 0.8%(1/126) and unknown mechanism 29.3% (37/126), respectively. Eleven c-Met overexpressed patients received gefitinib plus c-Met inhibitors crizotinib. Response rate (RR) by RECEIST was 45.5% (5/11), Disease control rate (DCR) was 54.5% (6/11), Progression disease (PD) was 45.5% (5/11). For patients with c-Met overexpression and without T790M DCR was 100% (5/5). Among these patients 40% (2/5) cases were ongoing at data cut-off. The longest duration of response to date is > 6 months. For patients with both c-Met/T790M positive no RR was found. We detected the protein expression of c-Met, p-Met, EGFR, p-EGFR, ERBB3, p-RBB3, AKT, p-AKT, MAPK, p-MAPK in tumor of 9 cases with c-Met/T790M by IHC. The results showed that all of the markers were positive in ≥ 50% cases (each marker was positive in at least 5 cases, respectively). Conclusions: c-Met overexpression could be as a biomarker for AR. Combination of EGFR TKIs and c-Met inhibitor is a good strategy to overcome AR for c-Met overexpressed patients, but not effective in c-Met/T790M-coexisting cases. One of the possible mechanism of resistance could contribute to both MET and EGFR signal pathway active.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 8091)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8091

Abstract #

8091

Poster Bd #

415

Abstract Disclosures