A safety extension study of anamorelin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with cachexia: ROMANA 3.

Authors

null

David Christopher Currow

Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

David Christopher Currow , Jennifer S. Temel , Kenneth Fearon , Ying Yan , John Friend , Amy Pickar Abernethy

Organizations

Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, Helsinn Therapeutics (US), Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, Duke University, Durham, NC

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome is a multifactorial condition, characterized by decreased body weight (mainly loss of lean body mass), which often occurs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with poor prognosis and impaired quality of life. Anamorelin HCl (ANAM) is a novel, oral selective ghrelin receptor agonist with appetite-enhancing and anabolic activity. Methods: ROMANA 1 and 2 (NCT01387269 and NCT01387282) are two global, double-blind, randomized, Phase 3 trials, assessing ANAM efficacy/safety in patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC and cachexia ( ≥ 5% weight loss within prior 6 months or BMI < 20 kg/m2). Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either daily oral 100 mg ANAM or placebo for 12 weeks. ROMANA 3 (NCT01395914) is the extension study; upon completion of ROMANA 1 or 2, patients with ECOG PS ≤ 2 had the option to continue their study treatment (ANAM or placebo) for a further 12 weeks. Patients were allowed to receive chemotherapy while on study. The primary endpoint was to assess safety and tolerability of ANAM. Results: Overall, 228 (44.4%) and 285 (55.6%) patients who completed ROMANA 1 and 2, respectively, were enrolled in ROMANA 3 (ANAM N = 345; placebo N = 168). Demographics at entry of ROMANA 3 were balanced between the treatment arms; the mean age was 62 years and most patients had an ECOG PS of 1 (72.3%) and had received chemotherapy (57.5%). Both ANAM- and placebo-treated patients had a similar incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), whether related to treatment or not (52.2% vs 55.7%), grade ≥ 3 TEAEs (22.5% vs 21.6%), and serious TEAEs (12.8% vs 12.6%). Drug-related TEAEs were reported in 3.5% vs 1.2% of ANAM- vs placebo-treated patients, the most common being hyperglycemia (1.2% vs 0.0%); there were no drug-related grade ≥ 3 TEAEs, or drug-related serious TEAEs. In the ANAM and placebo arms there were 35 (10.2%) and 22 (13.2%) deaths, respectively, none of which were drug-related. Conclusions: In this ROMANA 3 safety extension study, ANAM treatment over 24 weeks was well tolerated and the incidence of TEAEs was similar in both ANAM- and placebo-treated patients with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial information: NCT01395914

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Symptom Management/Supportive Care

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01395914

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr e20715)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e20715

Abstract #

e20715

Abstract Disclosures