Residual breast tissue after mastectomy in non high risk and BRCA mutated patients.

Authors

Georg Pfeiler

Georg Pfeiler

Med Univ of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Georg Pfeiler , Alex Farr , Ramona Woitek , Thomas Helbich , Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich , Christian F. Singer , Maria Bernathova

Organizations

Med Univ of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Med Uni Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Medical University Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Vienna, Austria, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate reconstruction by an implant are widely used in patients with breast cancer and in high risk patients for prophylaxis. Surgical procedure is guided by oncological aspects on the one hand – meaning cutaneous/subcutaneous envelope as thin as possible – and by cosmetic aspects on the other hand – meaning envelope as thick as possible. Pre-operative MRI might help the surgeon to choose the right thickness of this envelope. In this retrospective analysis we investigated the presence of residual breast tissue and the thickness of the envelope after SSM and NSM. Methods: Patients treated with SSM or NSM for prophylaxis or after breast cancer at a single university hospital, who had at least one post-operative MRI, were included. MRI’s were retrospectively analysed by two independent radiologists. Analyses included (a) the detection of residual breast tissue (yes/no) and (b) the maximum thickness of the envelope directly above the implant. Results: 39 patients of which 19 had bilateral SSM/NSM were included. 14 patients with BRCA 1/2 mutation had prophylactic bilateral SSM/NSM. Residual breast tissue could be detected in all 58 reconstructed breasts. The medium thickness of the envelope was 11.2mm (1-35mm). In patients with bilateral SSM/NSM, a strong correlation between the thickness of left and right breast envelope could be observed (r = 0.79, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Thickness of the envelope of the reconstructed breast does not appear to be the major determining factor of residual breast tissue.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Local Therapy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 1061)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.1061

Abstract #

1061

Poster Bd #

175

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts