Impact of rolapitant on quality of life (QoL) in patients (pts) receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).

Authors

Martin Chasen

Martin Chasen

Palliative Care, at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and the Medical Director of the Palliative Rehabilitation Program at the Élisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Martin Chasen , Laszlo Urban , Ian Schnadig , Bernardo Leon Rapoport , Allen Poma , Sujata Arora , Rudolph M. Navari , Lee Steven Schwartzberg , Cesare Gridelli

Organizations

Palliative Care, at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and the Medical Director of the Palliative Rehabilitation Program at the Élisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Matrahaza University Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary, Compass Oncology, US Oncology Research, McKesson Specialty Health, Tualatin, OR, The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa, TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, Indiana Univ School of Medcn South Bend, Mishawaka, IN, The West Clinic, Memphis, TN, SG Moscati Hosp, Avellino, Italy

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Rolapitant is a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist with a half-life of 180h, and does not inhibit CYP3A4 as other drugs do in the class, and therefore requires no dose modifications of concomitant steroids. Rolapitant demonstrated efficacy for prevention of CINV in phase 3 trials (HEC1, HEC2, and MEC). This pooled analysis examined the effect of rolapitant on QoL. Methods: In 3 double-blind, active-controlled studies, pts were randomized to oral rolapitant 200 mg or placebo 1–2 h before chemotherapy. All pts received active control: granisetron 2 mg oral or 10 mcg/kg IV and oral dexamethasone 20 mg. In the MEC study, granisetron was continued on Days 2 and 3. QoLwas assessed on Day 6 using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) Questionnaire, and reported as a total score and by nausea and vomiting domains. Pts with a valid questionnaire from the MITT population (all randomized pts who received at least 1 dose of study drug) in the 2 pooled HEC studies and one MEC study were analyzed. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. Most common cancers were breast for MEC and lung for HEC studies. At Day 6, significant improvements (P < 0.05) were observed with rolapitant vs. active control for FLIE total, nausea, and vomiting domain scores (Table). Conclusions: Rolapitant improved QoLin pts receiving both HEC and MEC compared with active control, in addition to providing significant protection from CINV. Clinical trial information: NCT01500213; NCT01499849; NCT01500226

HECMEC
RolapitantActive ControlRolapitantActive Control
Total Score, n491479605607
Mean (SD)114.5 (17.3)109.3 (24.5)112.7 (19.7)108.6 (23.5)
Mean difference
(95% CI)
5.2 (2.6, 7.9)4.1 (1.7, 6.5)
p-value*< 0.001< 0.001
Nausea Domain, n493480606608
Mean (SD)55.3 (11.3)53.5 (13.5)54.1 (12.4)52.3 (13.8)
Mean difference
(95% CI)
1.8 (0.2, 3.4)1.8 (0.3, 3.3)
p-value*0.0200.019
Vomiting Domain, n491479605607
Mean (SD)59.2 (8.1)55.8 (12.3)58.6 (9.2)56.3 (11.3)
Mean difference
(95% CI)
3.4 (2.1, 4.7)2.3 (1.1, 3.4)
p-value*< 0.001< 0.001
No impact on daily
life** n/N (%)
371/491 (75.6)339/479 (70.8)443/605 (73.2)409/607 (67.4)
p-value0.0820.027

*ANCOVA with study and gender as covariates; **FLIE total score >108

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Symptom Management/Supportive Care

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01500213; NCT01499849; NCT01500226

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 9615)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.9615

Abstract #

9615

Poster Bd #

274

Abstract Disclosures