Palliative Care, at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and the Medical Director of the Palliative Rehabilitation Program at the Élisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Martin Chasen , Laszlo Urban , Ian Schnadig , Bernardo Leon Rapoport , Allen Poma , Sujata Arora , Rudolph M. Navari , Lee Steven Schwartzberg , Cesare Gridelli
Background: Rolapitant is a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist with a half-life of 180h, and does not inhibit CYP3A4 as other drugs do in the class, and therefore requires no dose modifications of concomitant steroids. Rolapitant demonstrated efficacy for prevention of CINV in phase 3 trials (HEC1, HEC2, and MEC). This pooled analysis examined the effect of rolapitant on QoL. Methods: In 3 double-blind, active-controlled studies, pts were randomized to oral rolapitant 200 mg or placebo 1–2 h before chemotherapy. All pts received active control: granisetron 2 mg oral or 10 mcg/kg IV and oral dexamethasone 20 mg. In the MEC study, granisetron was continued on Days 2 and 3. QoLwas assessed on Day 6 using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) Questionnaire, and reported as a total score and by nausea and vomiting domains. Pts with a valid questionnaire from the MITT population (all randomized pts who received at least 1 dose of study drug) in the 2 pooled HEC studies and one MEC study were analyzed. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. Most common cancers were breast for MEC and lung for HEC studies. At Day 6, significant improvements (P < 0.05) were observed with rolapitant vs. active control for FLIE total, nausea, and vomiting domain scores (Table). Conclusions: Rolapitant improved QoLin pts receiving both HEC and MEC compared with active control, in addition to providing significant protection from CINV. Clinical trial information: NCT01500213; NCT01499849; NCT01500226
HEC | MEC | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rolapitant | Active Control | Rolapitant | Active Control | |||
Total Score, n | 491 | 479 | 605 | 607 | ||
Mean (SD) | 114.5 (17.3) | 109.3 (24.5) | 112.7 (19.7) | 108.6 (23.5) | ||
Mean difference (95% CI) | 5.2 (2.6, 7.9) | 4.1 (1.7, 6.5) | ||||
p-value* | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||
Nausea Domain, n | 493 | 480 | 606 | 608 | ||
Mean (SD) | 55.3 (11.3) | 53.5 (13.5) | 54.1 (12.4) | 52.3 (13.8) | ||
Mean difference (95% CI) | 1.8 (0.2, 3.4) | 1.8 (0.3, 3.3) | ||||
p-value* | 0.020 | 0.019 | ||||
Vomiting Domain, n | 491 | 479 | 605 | 607 | ||
Mean (SD) | 59.2 (8.1) | 55.8 (12.3) | 58.6 (9.2) | 56.3 (11.3) | ||
Mean difference (95% CI) | 3.4 (2.1, 4.7) | 2.3 (1.1, 3.4) | ||||
p-value* | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||
No impact on daily life** n/N (%) | 371/491 (75.6) | 339/479 (70.8) | 443/605 (73.2) | 409/607 (67.4) | ||
p-value | 0.082 | 0.027 | ||||
*ANCOVA with study and gender as covariates; **FLIE total score >108
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Rudolph M. Navari
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Camilla Vieira de Reboucas
2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Garrett Young