Ramucirumab (RAM) as second-line treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib: Patient-focused outcome (PFO) results from the phase 3 REACH study.

Authors

Ian Chau

Ian Chau

Royal Marsden, London & Surrey, United Kingdom

Ian Chau , Markus Peck-Radosavljevic , Christophe Borg , Peter Malfertheiner , Jean Francois Seitz , Joon Oh Park , Baek-Yeol Ryoo , Chia-Jui Yen , Masatoshi Kudo , Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon , Davide Pastorelli , Jean-Frédéric Blanc , Hyun Cheol Chung , Ari David Baron , Takuji Okusaka , Zhanglin Lin Cui , Allicia C. Girvan , Paolo Abada , Ling Yang , Andrew X. Zhu

Organizations

Royal Marsden, London & Surrey, United Kingdom, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna General Hospital and Medical University, Vienna, Austria, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China, Oncologia Medica I, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater, NJ, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: REACH did not demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in the ITT population, but pts in the RAM group with an elevated baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400ng/mL (pre-specified) had meaningful improvement in OS (HR 0.67, p < 0.05). Here we present PFOs (pt-reported FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Indexes [FHSI-8] and clinician-reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status [PS]) from the REACH study. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced HCC; Child-Pugh A; ECOG PS 0 or 1; and prior sorafenib. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive RAM (8 mg/kg) or placebo (PBO) on day 1 of an every 2 week cycle. The FHSI-8 was completed at baseline, cycles 4, 10, 16, and end of treatment. PS was assessed at baseline, each cycle, and end of treatment. Time to deterioration (TtD) in FHSI-8 was defined as the time from the randomization date to the first date with a ≥3-point decrease (based on 32-point scale) from baseline. TtD in PS was defined as the time from the randomization date to the first date a change to PS ≥2 was observed. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used to assess TtD. Results: Compliance with FHSI-8 was balanced between treatment arms. In the ITT population, TtD in FHSI-8 and PS were similar between RAM and PBO. In the elevated AFP population, there was a strong trend toward a delay in the deterioration of symptoms in FHSI-8 (p = 0.054) and PS (p = 0.057) for RAM treated pts compared to PBO. Conclusions: In the ITT population, symptom score and TtD were comparable between treatment arms; RAM did not result in the detriment in symptoms or pt functioning. Delay in symptom and PS deterioration coupled with survival benefit was observed in pts treated with RAM in the elevated AFP population. Clinical trial information: NCT01140347

ITT
AFP ≥400
ng/ml
RAMPBORAMPBO
FHSI-8 Compliance Baseline, %96.594.799.294.7
FHSI-8 Compliance End of Treatment, %62.172.567.276.6
FHSI-8 Score Change from Baseline, mean-2.44-2.86-2.21-3.73
TtD FHSI-8, mo
HR (95% CI)1.04 (0.80-1.34)0.69 (0.47-1.01)
P value0.780.054
TtD ECOG PS ≥2, mo
HR (95%CI)0.89 (0.65-1.22)0.64 (0.41-1.02)
P value0.470.057

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01140347

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 4077)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.4077

Abstract #

4077

Poster Bd #

187

Abstract Disclosures