A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): Analysis of the safety and short-term clinical outcomes.

Authors

null

Masakazu Takagi

Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Masakazu Takagi , Hitoshi Katai , Junki Mizusawa , Kenichi Nakamura , Takaki Yoshikawa , Masanori Terashima , Seiji Ito , Shin Teshima , Keisuke Koeda , Takeshi Sano , Norimasa Fukushima , Takeshi Yasuda , Yoshito Asao , Yoshiyuki Fujiwara , Mitsuru Sasako

Organizations

Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan, Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan, Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, Dept. of Surgery, NHO Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan, Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan, Dept. of Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Nishinomiya, Japan, Dept. of Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, Osaka, Japan, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Although the number of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has been increasing, there is no confirmatory randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of LADG compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG). Safety and short term outcome are presented. Methods: We conducted a RCT to confirm the non-inferiority of overall survival (OS) of LADG to ODG in patients with clinical IA (T1N0) or IB (T1N1 or T2 [MP] N0) gastric cancer. D1 or more dissection is applied for clinical stage IA and D2 dissection for clinical stage IB. Only the credentialed surgeons can be responsible for both procedures. The primary endpoint is (OS). The planned sample size was 920. Results: Between March 2010 and November 2013, 921 patients (LADG 462, ODG 459) were enrolled from 33 institutions. Operating time was longer in LADG than ODG (median 278 vs 194 min, p < 0.001). Blood loss was smaller in LADG than ODG (median 38 vs 115 ml, p < 0.001). There were no grade 3 or 4 intraoperative adverse events in either arm. There was no difference in the overall proportion of in-hospital, non-hematological grade 3 or 4 adverse events excluding biochemical data (3.3%: LADG, 3.7%: ODG). The proportion of grade 3 or 4 serum AST/ALT increased was higher in LADG than ODG (16.4% vs 5.3%, p < 0.001). The proportion of the patients who required an analgesic on postoperative days 5–10 was smaller in LADG than ODG (50.3% vs 59.3%, p = 0.006). The median time from surgery until the first episode of flatus was shorter in LADG than ODG (2 days vs 3 days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in both the highest body temperatures during the first 3 days after the surgery and the highest body temperatures during hospitalization. Conclusions: Although the elevation of serum AST/ALT should be taken care, this trial confirmed that LADG performed by the credentialed surgeons was safe as ODG in terms of adverse event and short-term clinical outcomes. LADG will be an alternative procedure in clinical IA/IB gastric cancer if the non-inferiority of LADG in OS is confirmed by the primary analysis planned in 2018. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003319.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

UMIN000003319

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 4017)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.4017

Abstract #

4017

Poster Bd #

126

Abstract Disclosures