Trends in the costs and utilization of targeted cancer therapies for the privately insured non-elderly: 2001-2011.

Authors

null

Fabrice Smieliauskas

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Fabrice Smieliauskas , Ya-Chen T. Shih , Daniel M. Geynisman , Ronan Joseph Kelly , Thomas J. Smith

Organizations

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center of Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Studies documenting high costs of cancer drugs often focus on targeted therapies as a whole without differentiating between oral and intravenous agents; such distinction is important because they differ in insurance design. Our study examined recent trends on targeted oral anticancer medications (tOAMs), and targeted IV anticancer medications (tIVAMs) and explored the cost drivers. Methods: We classified cancer drugs as tOAMs, tIVAMs, and non-targeted agents. Using the 2002-2011 LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database, we described trends in utilization and in insurance payments and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs per patient per month (PPPM) and during the first year of systemic therapy among privately insured non-elderly cancer patients. We performed Cochran-Armitage tests and generalized linear models to test the statistical significance of utilization and cost trends, respectively, and conducted decomposition analysis to disaggregate the cost trend into the increase driven by therapeutic substitution to more expensive classes of drugs vs. increases in drug prices over time. Results: Targeted therapies accounted for 11% of all systemic therapy utilization and 22% of systemic therapy expenditures in 2001, increasing to 42% (28% tIVAMs and 14% tOAMs) of utilization but 63% (38% tIVAMs, 25% tOAMs) of expenditures in 2011. Insurance payments PPPM for tOAMs more than doubled in ten years, growing from $3,381 PPPM in 2001 to $7,370 in 2011 (P < 0.001), whereas PPPM for tIVAMs remained fairly constant (around $7,000) throughout. Decomposition analyses of two time periods (2001-2005 and 2005-2010) showed that switching to more expensive classes of drugs accounted for the large majority of cost increase. Post-launch price increases contributed a 10-11% of spend increases during the two periods, while the increase in launch price accounted for 6% and 15% of spending growth, respectively, for each period. Conclusions: Payers should consider more aggressive management of pharmacy benefits for tOAMs and payment reforms for injectable drugs to contain the rising costs of cancer care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 6597)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6597

Abstract #

6597

Poster Bd #

154

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Danielle Rodin

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Systemic anti-cancer therapy and cost at end of life: A SEER Medicare analysis.

First Author: Kerin B. Adelson

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

The cost of doing business: Drug costs in federally sponsored cancer clinical trials.

First Author: Joseph M. Unger

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Trends of cancer drug cost increases and impact of generic and biosimilar drug launches.

First Author: Puneeth Indurlal