Survival following stereotactic body radiation therapy or conventionally fractionated radiation for definitive non-operative treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors

Clifford Robinson

Cliff Grant Robinson

Washington Univ in St Louis, St. Louis, MO

Cliff Grant Robinson , Aalok Patel , Jeffrey D. Bradley , Todd A. DeWees , Sana Rehman , Michael Charles Roach , Daniel Morgensztern , Traves Crabtree , Varun Puri

Organizations

Washington Univ in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Washington Univ School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Barnes-Jewish Hosp/ Washington Univ in St Louis, St Louis, MO, Washington Univ, St Louis, MO

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Despite a dramatic increase in utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-operative treatment of clinical stage I NSCLC over the last decade, there are no reported clinical trials or large scale comparisons with standard conventionally fractionated radiation (CFRT). We sought to compare overall survival (OS) between these modalities using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Methods: Patients with clinical stage I (AJCC 6th edition T1-T2N0M0) NSCLC who underwent definitive non-operative treatment with either SBRT or CFRT from 1998 to 2010 were identified from the NCDB. Cox regression was used to assess the impact of patient and treatment variables on OS. Inverse probability adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated to assess differences in OS while adjusting for baseline imbalances between the treatment groups. Results: A total of 19373 patients met inclusion criteria (5944 SBRT, 13429 CFRT). Median follow-up was 18.7 months. On multivariable analysis, improved OS was independently correlated with younger age, female gender, non-Caucasian race, lower Charlson comorbidity score, smaller tumor size, use of chemotherapy, treatment at an academic facility, and was most strongly associated with use of SBRT (HR .775, 95% CI, .737 to .817). Chemotherapy was delivered in 32.9% of CFRT patients and 4.2% of SBRT patients. Chemotherapy was correlated with improved OS on multivariable analysis for CFRT but not SBRT. In an adjusted Kaplan-Meier comparison, SBRT was associated with a significant increase in median (29.8 v 26.2 months) and 3-year (42.3% v 36.4%) OS compared with CFRT (P < .0001). Conclusions: In a large population-based analysis of outcomes in a modern cohort of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with definitive non-operative therapy, SBRT was associated with a significant improvement in OS compared with CFRT.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 7513)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.7513

Abstract #

7513

Poster Bd #

260

Abstract Disclosures