Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Charles S. Fuchs , Josep Tabernero , Jiri Tomasek , Ian Chau , Bohuslav Melichar , Howard Safran , Mustapha Ali Tehfe , Filip Dumitru , Eldar Topuzov , Luis Schlittler , Anghel Adrian Udrea , William Campbell , Stephen Brincat , Michael Emig , Symantha A. Melemed , Rebecca R. Hozak , David Ferry , William Caldwell , Jaffer A. Ajani
Background: Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are key regulators of tumor angiogenesis. RAM, a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), inhibits VEGF-A, -C and -D binding to VEGFR2 and inhibits ligand-induced mitogenesis of human endothelial cells. We evaluated candidate tumor (HER2, VEGFR2) and serum (VEGF-C, -D, and soluble [s] VEGFR1 and 3) biomarkers for correlation with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients from the randomized phase 3 REGARD trial (NCT00917384) that demonstrated survival benefits for RAM vs. PL. Methods: Of 355 patients randomized to RAM or PL in REGARD, there was at least one evaluable biomarker result for 152 (43%) patients using VEGFR2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HER2 (IHC or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]) in baseline tumor tissue samples. For 32 (9%) patients, baseline serum samples were analyzed using VEGF-C, -D, sVEGFR1 or 3 validated assays. Assay analyses were blinded. Results: The table provides the results of the HER2 analyses in tumor tissue (N = 147) and VEGFR2 analyses in tumor blood vessels (N = 143). The small number of patients with serum samples limited interpretation for candidate circulating biomarkers. Conclusions: Exploratory candidate biomarker analysis of tumor biopsies and serum from REGARD patients did not identify a significant predictive marker for RAM efficacy. Further examination of the role of VEGFR2 pathway biomarkers is warranted in ongoing RAM trials. Clinical trial information: NCT00917384
HER2+a RAM n=16 | HER2+a PL n=5 | HER2- a RAM n=80 | HER2- a PL n=46 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mOSb | 5.1 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 4.5 | ||
95% CI | 1.3-9.6 | 1.3-6.7 | 5.5-8.5 | 2.5-6.4 |
High VEGFR2c RAM n=49 | High VEGFR2c PL n=23 | HR | Low VEGFR2c RAM n=46 | Low VEGFR2c PL n=25 | HR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mOS b | 6.6 | 2.3 | 0.69 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 0.73 |
95% CI | 5.0-9.3 | 1.5-4.8 | 0.38-1.22 | 3.4-7.1 | 2.6-6.7 | 0.42-1.26 |
mPFS b | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.35 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.73 |
95% CI | 1.5-4.1 | 1.1-1.3 | 0.20-0.59 | 1.4-2.8 | 1.3-2.7 | 0.42-1.27 |
Note: Treatment-by-VEGFR2 interaction p-values, not adjusted for multiplicity, were 0.878 for mOS and 0.051 for mPFS. Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; m=median. aBang et al. 2010 criteria. bin months. cHigh= ≥ median H-score (35); low= <35.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: David H Aggen
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Kay T Yeung
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Tarek Mohamed Ahmed Abdel-Fatah
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Maximilian Lennartz