Cancer mortality and published research output: Is there any relationship?

Authors

null

Francis Patafio

Division of Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Francis Patafio , Steven C Brooks , Xuejiao Wei , Yingwei Peng , Janine Biagi , Christopher M. Booth

Organizations

Division of Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: The relative distribution of cancer research output across disease sites is not well described. Here we evaluate whether the volume of published research and clinical trials is proportional to mortality by cancer site. We also explore whether research output is proportional to research funding by cancer site. Methods: Statistics from the American and Canadian Cancer Societies were used to identify the top ten causes of cancer death in 2013. The OVID MEDLINE database identified all journal articles and clinical trials published in 2013 by US/Canadian authors for these cancer sites. Total research funding in Canada by cancer site was obtained from the 2011 report by Canadian Cancer Research Alliance. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to describe the relationship between research output (volume of publications and clinical trials), cancer mortality, and research funding. Results: We identified 19,361 publications and 2,661 clinical trials. The proportion of publications and clinical trials were substantially lower than the proportion of deaths for lung (41% deaths, 15% publications, 16% clinical trials), colorectal (14%, 7%, 6%), pancreas (10%, 7%, 5%), and gastroesophageal (7%, 5%, 3%) cancers. Conversely, research output was substantially greater than the proportional death for breast cancer (10% deaths, 29% publications, 30% clinical trials) and prostate cancer (8%, 15%, 17%). There was substantial variation in total research investment across cancer sites that was not due to differences in relative mortality. Total investment in 2013 in Canada per cancer death was $599 for bladder cancer, $1039 for lung cancer, $2197 for colorectal cancer, $9212 for prostate cancer, and $14,329 for breast cancer. There was stronger correlation between research output and funding (all publications r = 0.8942 p < 0.001; clinical trials r = 0.9258, p < 0.001), than there was between research output and cancer mortality (r = 0.3625, p = 0.3033 and r = 0.3395, p = 0.3372). Conclusions: Research output is not well correlated to cancer mortality but is correlated to relative level of research funding.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 6596)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6596

Abstract #

6596

Poster Bd #

153

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Association of area-level structural racism with racial disparities in cancer mortality.

First Author: Katherine Elizabeth Reeder-Hayes

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the Dominican Republic.

First Author: Yoanna S. Pumpalova

First Author: Karan Jatwani

First Author: Shaniza Haniff