S0713: A phase II study of cetuximab (CET) added to induction chemotherapy (ICT) of oxaliplatin (OX) and capecitabine (CAP), followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Authors

null

Cynthia G. Leichman

New York Univ, New York, NY

Cynthia G. Leichman , Shannon L McDonough , Stephen R Smalley , Kevin G. Billingsley , Heinz-Josef Lenz , Matthew A. Beldner , Aram F. Hezel , Mario R. Velasco , Katherine A Guthrie , Charles David Blanke , Howard S. Hochster

Organizations

New York Univ, New York, NY, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, Olathe Medical Center, Olathe, KS, Oregon Health and Sci Univ, Portland, OR, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Lowcountry Hem and Onc, Charleston, SC, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, Cancer Care Spclsts, Decatur, IL, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, Department of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

NIH

Background: NACR for LARC has been standard for 2 decades. Pathologic complete response (pCR) associates with improved survival and is an outcome surrogate in NACR clinical trials. In modern phase III trials of NACR in LARC, pCR ranges 15-20%. CET improves response rates in KRAS wild-type (KRAS-WT) metastatic colorectal cancer. S0713 was designed to select patients (PTS) by KRAS-WT status to assess improvement in pCR with CET added to ICT and NACR for LARC. Methods: Eligibility: Stage II-III biopsy proven LARC, KRAS-WT, without bowel obstruction or prior therapy, adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function, and performance status of 0-2. Peripheral neuropathy > grade 2 was exclusionary. Enrollment target was 80 eligible PTS with planned interim analysis after 40 PTS received all therapy; if < 7 pCR were observed at interim, the study was to close. Treatment consisted of ICT then NACR and surgery. Treatment regimen: Cycle 1: OX 50 mg/m2 day (d) 1,8,15,22,29, CET 400mg/m2 d1 then 250 mg/m2 d 8, 15, 22, 29 and CAP 825 mg/m2 p.o. BID Monday through Friday (M-F) d1-35; Rest d 36-49; Cycle 2: OX 50 mg/m2 d 50, 57, 71, 78, CET 250 mg/m2 d 50, 57, 64, 71, 78 and CAP 825 mg/m2 p.o. BID M- F d 50-85 with radiation 180 cGy/d M-F x 5 weeks (4500 cGy) followed by 540 cGy boost x 3 (stage II; 5040cGy) or 5 (stage 3; 5400cGy). Surgery occurred 3-8 weeks after NACR. 80 eligible PTS would give a power of 90% if true pCR > 35% at a significance of 0.04. The regimen would lack future interest if pCR < 20%. Results: From February 2009 to April 2013, 83 PTS registered; 5 were ineligible; 4 not treated. 74 were available for toxicity evaluation (TOX); 72 had available data; 62 PTS (86%) had surgery. 1 grade 5 TOX and 2 grade 4 TOX occurred. 7 PTS withdrew for TOX, 2 for other reasons. 18 of 62 PTS had pCR (25%, 95% CI 16-37%). 19 PTS (26%) had microscopic cancer; 35 PTS (49%) had minor/no response (10 no surgery). Conclusions: ICT and NACR with CET improved pCR over historical and recent rates of ~20%. Toxicity was generally acceptable. This approach can serve as a base for adding additional agents in KRAS-WT LARC. Additional analysis for resistance genes is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00686166

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00686166

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 3516)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.3516

Abstract #

3516

Poster Bd #

8

Abstract Disclosures