SWOG 0709: A randomized phase II “pick-the-winner” trial of erlotinib (ERL) vs. ERL plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/T) in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and impaired performance status (PS 2) as selected by serum proteomics.

Authors

Primo Lara, Jr

Primo Lara Jr.

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA

Primo Lara Jr., James Moon , Paul Joseph Hesketh , Mary Weber Redman , Stephen K. Williamson , Fred R. Hirsch , Philip C. Mack , David R. Gandara

Organizations

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, Lahey Hosp and Med Ctr, Burlington, MA, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Rsrch Ctr, Seattle, WA, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Advanced NSCLC pts with Zubrod PS2 are often excluded from clinical trials and platinum-based therapy. In SWOG 0341, ERL in PS 2 pts yielded progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 2.1 and 5 months respectively. In a trial of ERL versus C/T in PS2 pts (Lilenbaum, JCO 2008), PFS for ERL and C/T were 1.9 and 3.5 months. Early reports suggested a potential role for serum proteomics in predicting ERL benefit beyond that of EGFR mutational status. We conducted a trial in PS2 pts enriched by serum proteomics (Veristrat-good). Methods: NSCLC pts with PS2 and Veristrat-good status were randomized to either Arm A (ERL 150 mg po QD) or Arm B (ERL 150 mg po QD d2-16 + carbo AUC 5 IV day 1, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV d1 x 4 cycles, then ERL 150 mg QD). Cycles were q3 weeks. Arm B agents were pharmacodynamically separated to mitigate potential antagonism. The arm with superior observed median PFS would be selected for further evaluation, but only if ≥ 3 months. A sample size of 98 pts was based on a variety of assumed PFS probabilities for each arm. The trial prematurely closed after the FDA determined an IDE application was required for VeriStrat; however SWOG had limited resources available for such filing. Results: Of 156 pts screened, 83 (59%) were Veristrat-good, of which 59 (60%) met trial eligibility & were randomized. Treatment-related grade 4 adverse events were seen in 2 pts in Arm A (DVT, hypoMg+); 5 pts in Arm B (neutropenia 5, febrile neutropenia 1, leukopenia 1). Conclusions: In PS2 pts with advanced NSCLC and Veristrat-good status, ERL + C/T (vs. ERL alone) had better observed median PFS/OS and surpassed the protocol-specified benchmark of PFS >= 3 months required for further study. Clinical trial information: NCT00661193

Arm A:
ERL (N=33)
Arm B:
ERL + C/T (N=26)
p-value
Characteristics (n,%)
Median age (years)7571
Male sex14 (42%)10 (38%)
Adenocarcinoma27 (82%)23(88%)
Never smoker6 (18%)6 (23%)
Efficacy
Response rate* (n, %)2/32 (6%)6/26 (23%)0.06
DCR* (n, %)13/32 (41%)20/26 (77%)0.0046
PFS (median, months)1.64.60.06
OS (median, months)6110.27

*Subset w/ measurable disease at baseline.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00661193

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 8040)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8040

Abstract #

8040

Poster Bd #

362

Abstract Disclosures