Second-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cell carcinoma: Pooled analysis and construction of a prognostic model.

Authors

Samer Salah

Samer Salah

Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cance

Samer Salah , Jae-Lyun Lee , Antonio Rozzi , Hiroshi Kitamura , Kazumasa Matsumoto , Sandy Srinivas , Rafael Morales , Joan Carles , Rami Al-Wardat , Mohammad Maakoseh

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cance, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Clinical Oncology Unit, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano Grottaferrata, Grottaferrata, Italy, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, Oncology Department, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: A prognostic model for patients with metastatic urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) progressing following platinum-based therapy was constructed based on data from the phase 3 vinflunine trial. However, prognostic information for patients treated outside the setting of clinical trials and with variety of second-line regimens are limited. Methods: We gathered individual patient’s data from studies assessing second-line chemotherapy for metastatic UCC and analyzed the influence of factors of interest on overall survival (OS) through univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis. A prognostic model was constructed, and data of an independent series from a single institution was utilized for validation. Results: Data for 182 patients from seven studies were pooled. The second-line treatment was single agent in 22 (12%), platinum-based combination (nedaplatin or oxaliplatin) in 59 (33%), and non-platinum combination in 101 (55%). In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1, Hb<10, and metastatic patterns other than LN only metastasis emerged as independent adverse factors. Patients with all three factors (poor risk), 1-2 factors (intermediate risk), and 0 factors (Good risk) had median OS of 3.1, 8.8, and 16.5 months respectively, p< 0.0001. The corresponding median OS for the validation series (n = 44) were 3.3, 8.1, and 13.3 months, p = 0.023. Platinum – based regimens were associated with OS benefit compared to other combination regimens and to single agents, such benefit was retained when this factor was included in multivariate analysis (HR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.82- 4.98, p< 0.0001). In addition, freedom of progression at 6 months from initiation of second- line therapy correlated with improved survival compared to progression within 6 months; median OS 13.9 and 6.6 months respectively, p< 0.0001. Conclusions: We proposed and validated a prognostic model for patients with metastatic UCC who are eligible for second-line therapy. The proposed model may prove helpful for risk-stratification. Furthermore, our data suggest that testing second- line platinum-based regimens in randomized trials is warranted.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Prostate, Penile, Testicular, and Urethral Cancers, and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 7; abstr 309)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.309

Abstract #

309

Poster Bd #

E20

Abstract Disclosures