Safety and efficacy of temsirolimus as second-line treatment for patients with recurrent bladder cancer.

Authors

null

Nadine Houede

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nîmes, France

Nadine Houede , Guilhem Roubaud , Hakim Mahammedi , Lionel Vedrine , Florence Joly , Loic Mourey , Christian Pfister , Stephane Culine , Alejandro Goberna , Barbara Lortal , Marina Pulido , Philippe Pourquier , Carine A. Bellera

Organizations

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nîmes, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Val-de-Grâce Hospital, Paris, France, Comite Uro-Gynecologie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France, Centre Hospitalier de Rouen, Rouen, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France, INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France, Institut Bergonié, Regional Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Bladder cancer is the 7th cause of death from cancer in men and 10th in women. For metastatic patients, prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of 15 months that remained unchanged for the past 15 years. No standard second-line chemotherapy is available for patients who relapse. Acquired mutations leading to a deregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been reported in more than 40% of bladder cancers suggesting the use of the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signalling pathway as an attractive target for the treatment of urothelial tumors. Methods: The main objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor that is already used for the treatment of renal cancers, in patients with recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer who already received a first line chemotherapy. Efficacy was measured in terms of non-progression of the disease at two months of treatment following the RECIST v1.1 criteria. Based on a two-stage optimal Simon’s design, a total of 15 non-progressions out of 51 eligible and assessable patients were required to claim efficacy. Patients were treated at a weekly dose of 25 mg until progression, unacceptable toxicities or withdrawal. Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study between November 2009 and July 2014 in seven French centres. At the end of the first stage, six patients out of 17 were progression-free at 2 months leading to the inclusion of additional 37 patients in the second stage of the study. Thirty-six patients were eligible and assessable for the primary efficacy endpoint. A total of 18 (50%) non-progressions were observed at 2 months. Among them, partial response was documented for two patients and stable disease for 16. Twenty-five related adverse events were observed in 19 (35.2%) of the patients. Conclusions: Our study is providing the first clinical evidence of a potential benefit of temsirolimus for the treatment of relapsed bladder cancers. Ancillary study is ongoing to investigate the mutational status of genes which are involved in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway in order to identify a predictive signature of response to temsirolimus in bladder cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT0187943NCT0187943.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Prostate, Penile, Testicular, and Urethral Cancers, and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT0187943NCT0187943

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 7; abstr 304)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.304

Abstract #

304

Poster Bd #

E15

Abstract Disclosures