Short-course hormonal therapy and the risk of death from prostate cancer in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing high-dose radiation therapy.

Authors

null

Florence K. Keane

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Florence K. Keane , Ming-Hui Chen , Danjie Zhang , Brian Joseph Moran , Michelle H. Braccioforte , Anthony Victor D'Amico

Organizations

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago, Westmont, IL, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: We assessed the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in men with unfavorable and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) who received dose-escalated radiotherapy (RT) with or without short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods: The cohort consisted of 2,668 men with intermediate-risk PC (71.3% favorable, 28.7% unfavorable) who were treated with dose-escalated RT with or without ADT (median 4 mos.) from 1997 - 2013. Fine and Gray's competing risks regression was used to assess whether ADT decreased PCSM-risk in an adjusted multivariable model (Table). An interaction term was included to assess for potential differences in the impact of ADT on PCSM risk in men with favorable versus unfavorable intermediate-risk PC. Results: After a median follow-up of 7.84 years, there were 393 deaths (14.73%), of which 33 were from PC (8.40%). There was significant reduction in PCSM-risk in men with unfavorable intermediate-risk PC who received ADT (AHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.92, P=0.033), but no significant difference in PCSM-risk in men with favorable intermediate-risk PC who received ADT (AHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.19 to 2.49, P=0.561). Conclusions: While ADT reduced PCSM-risk in men with unfavorable intermediate-risk PC, there was no significant improvement in men with favorable intermediate-risk PC, suggesting that for these patients ADT in addition to dose-escalated RT may not be required to minimize PCSM-risk.

Adjusted hazard ratios from competing risks regression in interaction model assessing PCSM-risk.

Clinical characteristicsNo. of
men
No. of
PC deaths
AHR95% CIP
Age in years2,668331.03[0.98, 1.09]0.258
Year of brachytherapy2,668330.82[0.74, 0.92]0.0005
Interaction tests
Management
High-dose RT w/o ADT1,677191.0 (ref)----
High-dose RT w/ ADT991140.39[0.16, 0.92]0.033
Risk group
Favorable intermediate- risk1,902130.22[0.10, 0.51]0.0004
Unfavorable intermediate- risk766201.0 (ref)----
Interaction
ADT x risk group^2,668331.74[0.38, 7.91]0.470

^ Within interaction model, AHR for high-dose RT with versus without ADT within favorable intermediate-risk PC is 0.68 [95% CI, 0.19 to 2.49, P=0.561].

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 7; abstr 27)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.27

Abstract #

27

Poster Bd #

B19

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts