Prevalence and outcomes of patients (pts) with EGFR S492R ectodomain mutations in ASPECCT: Panitumumab (pmab) vs. cetuximab (cmab) in pts with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Authors

Timothy Price

Timothy Jay Price

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, Australia

Timothy Jay Price , Kathryn Newhall , Marc Peeters , Tae Won Kim , Jin Li , Stefano Cascinu , Paul Ruff , Attili Venkatasatya Suresh , Anne Thomas , Sergei Tjulandin , Michael Boedigheimer , Kathy Zhang , Roger Sidhu , Swaminathan Murugappan

Organizations

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, Australia, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Cancer Hospital of Shanghai Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, A.O. Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, India, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom, N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center of RAMS, Moscow, Russia, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, Amgen Inc., San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Mutations resistant to anti-EGFR treatment (tx), beyond those in RAS, have been reported and include EGFR S492R. We report results for pts with EGFR S492R mutations in the phase 3 ASPECCT trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive pmab or cmab. Crossover was not allowed. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. EGFR S492R was evaluated by digital droplet PCR in plasma samples collected pre-tx and post-tx (safety follow-up 4 wks after the last dose). Outcomes were analyzed by EGFR S492 status. Results: Of 999 pts randomized and treated, post-tx samples were available for EGFR S492 assessment from 53% of pts (261/496) in the pmab arm and 57% of pts (285/503) in the cmab arm. EGFR S492R was detected in 1% of pts in the pmab arm and 16% of pts in the cmab arm in post-tx samples. EGFR S492R was not detected in pre-tx samples. Results are shown (table). Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of pts with available samples from ASPECCT, 16% of pts in the cmab arm and 1% of pts in the pmab developed EGFR S492R mutations. Pts with EGFR S492R in the cmab arm had longer tx duration before progressive disease (PD) and appeared to have worse OS vs pts with wild-type S492 in the cmab arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01001377

EGFR S492
Evaluable Pts
Pmab
(n = 262)
Cmab
(n = 284)
HR (95% CI)
Median OS - mos (95% CI)12.5 (11.2 – 14.3)12.8 (11.7 – 14.7)1.03 (0.85 – 1.25)
Median PFS - mos (95% CI)4.8 (4.4 – 4.9)4.8 (4.7 – 5.0)1.10 (0.92 – 1.30)
ORR - % (95% CI)28.2 (22.9 – 34.1)25.4 (20.4 – 30.8)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
1.15 (0.77 – 1.72)
Tx duration - wks
(range)
22 (2-70)21 (1-94)
Tx discontinuation
due to PD (%)
9494
EGFR S492
Evaluable Cmab Pts
Cmab EGFR S492R (mutant)
(n = 46)
Cmab EGFR S492
(n = 238)
HR (95% CI)
Median OS - mos (95% CI)11.9 (10.7 – 14.0)13.8 (11.5 – 15.4)1.75 (1.23 – 2.50)
Median PFS - mos (95% CI)5.1 (4.9 – 6.7)4.7 (3.2 – 4.9)0.68 (0.10 – 4.92)
ORR - % (95% CI)39.1 (25.1 – 54.6)22.7 (17.5 – 28.5)
Odds Ratioa
(95% CI)
0.45 (0.22 – 0.94)
Tx duration - wks
(range)
22 (6-61)15 (1-94)
Tx discontinuation
due to PD (%)
9894

aCmab EGFR S492:Cmab EGFR S492R (mutant)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01001377

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 3; abstr 740)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.740

Abstract #

740

Poster Bd #

E30

Abstract Disclosures