LUME-Colon 1: A double-blind, randomized phase III study of nintedanib plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) refractory to standard therapies.

Authors

null

Heinz-Josef Lenz

Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

Heinz-Josef Lenz , Josep Tabernero , Takayuki Yoshino , Zohra Oum'Hamed , Soetkin Vlassak , Mouna Sassi , Eric Van Cutsem

Organizations

Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Boehringer Ingelheim France S.A.S., Reims, France, SCS Boehringer Ingelheim Comm. V., Brussels, Belgium, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Clinical studies with anti-VEGF agents, such as regorafenib (R), demonstrate that angiogenesis is critical to CRC tumor growth and metastasis. R has provided proof of principle in patients with refractory CRC, but is associated with a specific safety profile; there is a need for an effective alternative treatment with a different safety profile. Nintedanib (N) is a triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, and FGF signaling that has shown clinical benefit and a manageable safety profile in trials in several tumor types, including NSCLC, ovarian cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. In a recent Phase I study of N in CRC, one patient had a confirmed partial response, and a clinically relevant anti-angiogenic effect was observed in 67% of patients. These findings and a manageable safety profile provide a rationale to examine N in refractory CRC. The objective of this study (NCT02149108; 1199.52) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of N in patients with refractory CRC after failure with standard chemotherapy and biologic agents. Methods: 764 patients worldwide (≥18 years of age, ECOG-PS 0–1, and histologically/cytologically confirmed CRC adenocarcinoma unamenable to surgery and/or radiotherapy) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either N (200 mg bid) + BSC or placebo (bid) + BSC in 21-day courses until disease progression or undue toxicity. The study is powered to distinguish a clinically meaningful effect in the co-primary endpoints PFS and OS. Secondary endpoints are objective tumor response and disease control. Patients will be stratified at randomization based on previous R treatment (yes vs. no), time from onset of metastatic disease to randomization (<24 months vs. ≥24 months), and region. PFS and OS will be evaluated by the log-rank test to determine the effect of N independently at the two-sided alpha level of 0.05. Other assessments include frequency and severity of adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters to measure safety; health-related quality of life; and biomarker analyses that will focus on exploring predictive biomarkers and drug resistance mechanisms. Results are expected in 2016. Clinical trial information: NCT02149108

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02149108

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 3; abstr TPS794)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.tps794

Abstract #

TPS794

Poster Bd #

F32

Abstract Disclosures