Efficacy and safety of nintedanib versus sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A randomized phase II trial.

Authors

null

Ann-Lii Cheng

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Ann-Lii Cheng , Chia-Jui Yen , Tae-You Kim , Yin-Hsun Feng , Yee Chao , Deng-Yn Lin , Arsene-Bienvenu Loembe , Julia Hocke , Caren Choi , Baek-Yeol Ryoo

Organizations

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Chi Mei Medical Centre Yongkang, Tainan City, Taiwan, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Boehringer Ingelheim B.V., Alkmaar, Netherlands, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany, Boehringer Ingelheim Korea Ltd., Seoul, South Korea, Asan Medical Centre, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Nintedanib (N) is an oral, triple angiokinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors. This randomized, multicenter, open-label, Phase II study (NCT00987935; 1199.39) evaluated the efficacy and safety of N versus sorafenib (S) in Asian patients with advanced HCC. Preliminary analysis showed similar time to progression (TTP) by independent central review (ICR). Methods: Asian patients with unresectable advanced HCC, Child–Pugh score 5–6, ECOG-PS ≤2, and alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ≤2× upper limit of normal were enrolled. Patients were randomized 2:1 to N 200 mg bid or S 400 mg bid continuously in 28-day cycles, until intolerable adverse events (AEs) or disease progression (PD); treatment beyond PD was allowed if clinical benefit was perceived. Primary endpoint was TTP by ICR (RECIST 1.0) and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed (IA) TTP. Results: Patients (N=95) were randomized to receive N (n=63) or S (n=32); arms were balanced except for macroscopic vascular invasion (48% vs 31%). At the final cutoff date (16 Jul 14), 88% of patients had a TTP event, and 86% had an OS event; 1 patient was on treatment beyond PD. N and S had comparable IA TTP (median 2.8 vs 3.0 months; HR 1.39 [95% CI: 0.87–2.23]) and OS (median 10.2 vs 10.7 months; HR 0.94 [95% CI: 0.59–1.49]). ICR TTP data are pending. All but 1 patient reported an AE (CTCAE 3.0). More S-treated patients had Grade ≥3 AEs (56% vs 84%), serious AEs (46% vs 56%), and AEs leading to dose reduction (19% vs 59%) and drug discontinuation (24% vs 34%). Class-specific AEs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in >15% of S-treated patients were hypertension, hand-foot skin reaction, and thrombocytopenia; only anemia was higher with N. AEs previously observed and higher with N were vomiting and nausea; ALT/AST increases and diarrhea were higher with S. Rash was reported in >15% of patients only with S. Conclusions: N shows similar efficacy to S for TTP and OS. N was better tolerated than S and AEs were generally manageable. Further studies of N in Asian patients with advanced HCC are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00987935

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00987935

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl 3; abstr 339)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.339

Abstract #

339

Poster Bd #

C8

Abstract Disclosures