Outcomes of supportive/palliative care (SPC) for advanced cancer patients (AdCa) in a general public hospital and a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors

null

Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay, Jeanette Ferrer, Jewel Ochoa, Hilda Cantu, Janet L. Williams, Minjeong Park, Rechelle L. Asirot, Nneamaka Enwemnwa, Renee Flores, Rodrigo C. Guanlao, Faheem M Haq, Suchrita R. Kamineni, Eduardo Bruera

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, The University of Texas Health Science, Medical School, Houston, TX

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: AdCa experience severe physical, psychosocial and existential distress. Their needs might not be met only by standard care. We compared outcomes of AdCa receiving SPC at a General Public Hospital (GPH) and at a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). Methods: We reviewed 364 consecutive AdCa(182 at GPH and 182 at CCC). AdCa were managed by SPC-specialists with common clinical-pathways. We assessed symptoms(Edmonton Symptom Assessment System:ESAS) and outcomes at consult and first follow-up. Results: Race was White, African-American, and Hispanic in 42(23%), 70(39%), 63(35%) at GPH vs. 112(64%, p<0.0001), 30(17%, p<0.0001), 20(11%, p<0.0001) at CCC, respectively. Age, gender and cancer diagnoses were similar at both sites. 98(54%) at GPH vs. 181(99%) at CCC reported to have some health-insurance(p<0.0001). Symptoms at consult-time at GPH and CCC: Pain 133(85%) vs. 151(91%,p=0.0586); Fatigue 127(80%) vs. 153(94%,p<0.0001); Nausea 69(44%) vs. 89(55%,p=0.0438); Depression 79(51%) vs. 109(68%,p=0.0015); Anxiety 72(46%) vs. 121(75%,p<0.0001); Drowsiness 78(50%) vs. 119(76%, p<0.0001); Appetite 89(56%) vs. 146(91%, p<0.0001); Dyspnea 72(46%) vs. 107(65%,p=0.0004); Sleep 90(59%) vs. 142(88%,p<0.0001); and Well-Being 95(63%) vs. 132(93%,p<0.0001). Both SPC provided multiple not different interventions: opioid-management, medication review for polypharmacy, bowel-regimen, antiemetics, and interdisciplinary counseling. At follow-up ESAS-improvement(decrease ≥2 points) was: pain 21/80(26%) at GPH vs. 43/107(40%) at CCC(p=0.0469), anxiety 18/75(24%) vs. 40/98(41%,p=0.0202); appetite 15/74(20%) vs. 37/90(41%,p=0.0043); sleep 20/74(27%) vs. 42/95(44%,p=0.0215); nausea 23/77(30%) vs. 35/97(36%,p=0.3879); depression 18/74(24%) vs. 30/94(32%,p=0.2796). Median Time(range) from consult-to-follow-up at GPH 21 days(0-427) vs. 14 days(1-275,p=0.032), and from consult-to-death at GPH 53 days(1-699) vs. 51 days(1-898,p=0.8473). Conclusions: AdCa at GPH and CCC had frequent and severe-symptoms. Response-rate was lower and follow-up less-frequent at GPH. SPC needs to be more frequent and more resources are needed at GPH.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: <span>Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Psycho-Oncology</span>

Track

Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 31; abstr 208)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.31_suppl.208

Abstract #

208

Poster Bd #

E14

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Sara Marie DeForge

First Author: Desiree Rachel Azizoddin

First Author: Desiree Rachel Azizoddin

First Author: Jun J. Mao