Developing a decision support tool for responding to patients’ reported levels of information needs, family anxiety, depression, and breathlessness.

Authors

null

Liesbeth van Vliet

King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation, London, United Kingdom

Liesbeth van Vliet, Richard Harding, Claudia Bausewein, Sheila Payne, Irene J. Higginson

Organizations

King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation, London, United Kingdom, Munich University Hospital, Department of Palliative Medicine, Munich, Germany, International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, Lancaster, United Kingdom, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Routine clinical use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) such as the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) may be prevented by a lack of guidance on how to respond to reported symptoms. When using POS in clinical care, clinicians encounter the most difficulties with responding to information needs, depression and family anxiety while breathlessness remains a difficult to treat symptom. We aimed to create a Decision Support Tool (DST) on how to respond to different levels of these patient-reported symptoms. Methods: A systematic search for guidelines and systematic reviews on these topics was conducted (in Pubmed, Cochrane and York DARE databases, Googlescholar, NICE, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Canadian Medical Association, Google.com). In a two-round online Delphi study purposefully sampled international experts (clinicians, researchers, patient representatives) judged the appropriateness (1-9 scale + do not know option) of drafted recommendations for each POS answer category (0-4) and provided qualitative remarks. Recommendations with a median of 7-9 and <30% of scores between 1-3 and 7-9 were included in the DST. Quality was assessed using an adapted GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-five out of 38 (66%) experts participated in round 1, 23 out of 37 (62%) in round 2. Higher POS scores were related to more included recommendations. The DST consists of both a manual and flow-charts of included recommendations for each topic. Overall, psychosocial interventions were recommended for lower levels of depression and breathlessness than drug interventions (e.g., goal-setting/coping versus morphine for breathlessness). Good communication and emotional support were recommended for low family anxiety levels, but a social needs assessment only for higher levels. For information needs recommendations were least discriminative; almost all recommendations (e.g., assess patients’ understanding of information, show empathy) seemed always relevant. Conclusions: The developed DST can assist clinical responses to patient-reported symptoms in palliative care. Future work is needed to test the effect of using the DST on patients’ outcomes.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: End-of-Life Care, <span>Patient-Reported Outcomes</span>, and Survivorship

Track

Survivorship,Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 31; abstr 173)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.31_suppl.173

Abstract #

173

Poster Bd #

E6

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Patient-reported outcomes from the BESPOKE CRC study.

First Author: Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Examining the prevalence of anxiety and depression in surgical oncology patients: Results of a prospective cohort study.

First Author: Judy Li