Supportive care organization: Patients and oncologist national survey comparison.

Authors

null

Florian Scotte

Supportive Care Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France

Florian Scotte, Christian Herve, Jean Marc Tourani, Roland Bugat, Fadila Farsi, Nicolas Jovenin, Moise Namer, Christophe Tournigand, Pauline Leroy, Stephane Oudard, Ivan Krakowski

Organizations

Supportive Care Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France, University Rene Descartes, Paris, France, Department of Oncology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France, Institute Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: The medical doctor's (MD) perspective of supportive care in cancer (SCC) in France was previously assessed on a national survey. However, the opinion of patients (P) has never been evaluated nor compared to MD’s perception.Wepromoted and compared P and MD awareness via national surveys to monitor implementation and information delivered to patients on SCC. Methods: The French Speaking Association for SCC (AFSOS) conducted two observational studies, analyzed with a Chi2 test: S1: a 30 points questionnaire sent to 2,263 physicians caring for cancer P (oncologists, radiotherapists, haematologists, gastroenterologists); and S2: a 40 points questionnaire performed by physicians to P, using a face-to-face method. Results: 711 MDs returned S1 and S2 was conducted with 1,562 P. In S1, MDs declared relying on SCC organization (81%) but 19% of P declared they were offered to benefit from an organization called SCC (54% at diagnosis, 35% after complication). The name SCC was known by 34% of P, most frequently described as complementary care to specific treatments (55%). Palliative Care word had been previously heard by 80% P, mostly considered as care to improve quality of life during cancer treatment for 59%. In S2, professional resources identified outside the hospital were: general practitioners (84%), nurses (58%), pharmacists (52%). According to P, the top 3 supportive care consultations proposed were psychology (61%), nutrition (55%) and announcement organization (55%), while MDs mentioned palliative care (98%), psychological care (98%), social care (98%), S2 showed that supportive treatment was prescribed to 63% of P, mostly by their oncologist (74%), and 64% of those P received information on side-effects. Epoetin was prescribed to 25% and analgesics to 73%, with discussion on adverse events respectively for 38% and 53%. MDs declared delivering information on adverse events to 49% of P receiving epoetin and to 74% of P running for analgesic treatment. Conclusions: Oncologist is the cornerstone of SCC organization. Information as well as treatment must be developed to further enhance SCC and patient quality of care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: <span>Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Psycho-Oncology</span>

Track

Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 31; abstr 202)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.31_suppl.202

Abstract #

202

Poster Bd #

E8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Quality of colorectal and anal cancer care delivered during the COVID pandemic.

First Author: Melanie Lynn Powis

First Author: Kristen Simmons

First Author: Amy Foster