A randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the palliative benefit of either continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronate in patients with high-risk bone metastases from breast cancer (The Odyssey Study).

Authors

null

Carmel Maree Jacobs

The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Carmel Maree Jacobs, Iryna Kuchuk, Stephanie Smith, Sasha Mazzarello, Lisa Vandermeer, Nathan Bouganim, Susan Dent, Stan Z. Gertler, Shailendra Verma, Vince Young, Xinni Song, Demetrios Simos, George Dranitsaris, David Cella, Mark Clemons

Organizations

The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Independent Consultant, Toronto, ON, Canada, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Questions remain around the optimal use of bone-targeted agents (BTA) in patients with bone metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC). In Canada pamidronate (PAM) is the most commonly used BTA in BC.We explored whether a switch to a more potent BTA, like zoledronic acid (ZA), in patients who remain at high risk of skeletal related events (SREs) despite PAM use is associated with significant palliative benefit. Methods: BC patients with high risk BM (prior SRE, bone progression, bone pain or levels of bone turnover marker serum C-telopeptide (sCTX) >400ng/L) despite >3 months of PAM use were eligible. Patients were randomized in a double–blind manner to either switch to ZA or continue on PAM every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a fall in sCTX at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were pain control (BPI and FACT-BP) and toxicity. Results 73 patients completed the study. Median age 61 years (range 37 – 87), prior duration of PAM use 10 months (range 3 – 118). sCTX levels for all patients at baseline, 372+/- 471, week 12, 209 +/-290. Proportion of patients achieving a fall in sCTX from week 0 to week 12, 26/31 (84%) in ZA arm, 17/30 (57%) in PA arm, p=0.0262. Two patients were unable to complete the study due to deterioration in renal function (both receiving PAM), four due to progressive disease (two receiving ZA, two PAM), two patients chose to discontinue the study before completion (both receiving ZA). Four patients (5%) had SRE’s during the study, two receiving ZA, two receiving PAM. Quality of life and pain analysis shows no difference between week 0 and week 12 scores in either arm. Toxicity was predominantly grade 1 and 2, numerically there were more adverse effects in the ZA arm than PAM. Conclusion Switching patients with high risk BM from PAM to ZA leads to a reduction in sCTX levels but may be associated with more toxicity. Quality of life and pain scores were similar between the two treatments. While the literature suggests that a reduction in sCTX may correlate with reduced rate of SREs, given the lack of symptom improvement a switching strategy cannot be recommended. NCT01907880 Clinical trial information: NCT01907880.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: End-of-Life Care, <span>Patient-Reported Outcomes</span>, and Survivorship

Track

Survivorship,Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01907880

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 31; abstr 155)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.31_suppl.155

Abstract #

155

Poster Bd #

D6

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Trends of skeletal related events in patients with breast cancer metastasized to bone.

First Author: Prasanth Lingamaneni

First Author: Monika Kumar

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Multicenter Italian bone metastasis database: First prospective data on breast cancer patients.

First Author: Alberto Bongiovanni