An electronic prompt to improve hepatitis B virus screening prior to cancer treatment.

Authors

null

Lisa K. Hicks

St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Lisa K. Hicks, Jordan J. Feld, Joshua Juan, Judy Truong, Urszula Zurawska, Angie Giotis, Kelvin K. Chan

Organizations

St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a potentially fatal complication of cancer therapy that is almost entirely preventable. Despite this, HBV screening rates remain low at many centers. We evaluated the effectiveness of an electronic prompt on HBV screening rates and compared this strategy with education alone. Methods: An education session on HBV reactivation was delivered to all oncology staff at two large, academic oncology centers in the fall of 2010. At one center (study center) an electronic prompt was also introduced. The electronic prompt reminded physicians to screen for HBV when booking a new patient’s first chemotherapy and automatically trigged an electronic order for HBsAg if the physician assented. The prompt was not implemented at the second (control) center. The primary endpoint was the rate of HBV screening. Actual HBV screening rates were determined in both centers for 10 months prior to and for 12 months following the interventions. HBV screening rates were assessed and compared with process control charts (p-charts); 3-sigma limits were employed to define special cause variation. Results: 6,116 new patients received their first chemotherapy during the study period (2,095 study center; 4,021 control center). In the pre-prompt period, the screening rate was stable at 16% at the study center and 25% in the control center. In the prompt period, the screening rate increased to 62% at the study center and was unchanged at 25% in the control center. Special cause variation suggesting a non-random improvement in HBV screening rate was detected at the Study Center two months after the introduction of the electronic prompt. Conclusions: An electronic prompt increased the rate of HBV screening, however screening rates remained relatively low. Education sessions did not appear to improve the HBV screening rate.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality and Practice of Quality

Track

Practice of Quality,Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality

Sub Track

Use of IT to Improve Quality

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 30; abstr 169)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.30_suppl.169

Abstract #

169

Poster Bd #

G18

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Michael Adashek

Abstract

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Preventing complications: Hepatitis B screening in cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy.

First Author: Rebecca M. Prince

Abstract

2018 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Implementation of a hepatitis B screening process prior to CD20 therapy treatment in an oncology practice.

First Author: Ali McBride