Assessing the impact of a targeted electronic medical record intervention on growth factor usage in cancer patients.

Authors

null

Jordan Bernens

West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV

Jordan Bernens, Kara Hartman, Brendan F. Curley, Sijin Wen, Jame Abraham, Michael David Newton

Organizations

West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center at West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, WV, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Patients receiving chemotherapy are at risk for febrile neutropenia following treatment. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend screening patients for risk of febrile neutropenia and risk stratification based on likelihood of febrile neutropenia events. Prophylactic growth factors (G-CSF) should be in patients receiving high-risk regimens or intermediate-risk regimens with individual risk factors. The impact of electronic medical record system (EMR) implementation on compliance with G-CSF support guidelines has not been studied. Methods: At West Virginia University/Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center we conducted an IRB approved retrospective chart review of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy from January 1, 2007 to August 1, 2008 (pre-EMR) and January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (post-EMR). We reviewed the chemotherapy regimens and patient risk factors for developing febrile neutropenia, and determined if the G-CSF usage was consistent with guideline recommendations. Results: Compliance with prophylactic G-CSF guidelines was 75.6% in the post-EMR arm, compared to 67.5% in the pre-EMR arm (p=0.041, ch-square). The post EMR data of 1,042 new chemotherapy initiations showed: (see Table). The appropriateness of usage in high and low risk patients were the most compliant, as G-CSF orders were built into chemotherapy plans of high risk regimens and omitted from low risk regimens. Conclusions: Appropriate prophylactic G-CSF usage can be improved when orders are integrated into standard chemotherapy order sets in an EMR. An area of further improvement would include automatic identification of individual risk factors by the EMR.

G-CSF indicated
Not indicated
High risk Intermediate risk with risk factors Intermediate risk without risk factors Low risk
G-CSF usage 89.1% 58.7% 26.2% 19.3%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Science of Quality and Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality

Track

Science of Quality,Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality

Sub Track

Quality Measurement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 30; abstr 262)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.30_suppl.262

Abstract #

262

Poster Bd #

F3

Abstract Disclosures