Oral oncolytics: Patient-monitoring improvements in private practice.

Authors

null

Tallat Mahmood

Mid-Michigan Physicians, Lansing, MI

Tallat Mahmood, Lindsey Redouty, Elaine McNamera

Organizations

Mid-Michigan Physicians, Lansing, MI, Memorial Health Care, Owosso, MI, Owosso Memorial Hospital, Owosso, MI

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: The use of oral oncolytics is becoming more common. These drugs have their own unique challenges in managing patient initiation, monitoring side effects and adherence. Methods: We conducted a baseline chart audit of patients prescribed oral oncolytics in our private oncology practice followed by a quality improvement program and subsequent reassessment. Information obtained included: prescription date, actual start date and any documented problems with the oral therapy. The baseline audit included patients from may of 2011 to July 2013. Subsequently we joined the Michigan oncology quality consortium’s oral chemotherapy collaborative and initiated the following: office procedures for identification of all patients on oral therapy, use of the Edmonton Symptoms assessment system (ESAS), and a self-care management education program including patient self-monitoring of symptoms with recommended initial treatments. A postintervention audit was conducted from August 2013 to March 2014. Results: We identified 25 patients in the first time period and 13 in the second. In the first time period we found only 13 of the 25 patients had an actual start date documented, and of these 13, 10 had a >/=4 week delay prior to starting therapy, with 3/13 having a 2-4 week delay prior to start of therapy. 12 of the 25 patients discontinued their drug within the first month due to side effects without consulting their physician. After participating in the quality initiative, we identified only one patient without a documented start date, only 1/13 that had a > 4 week delay from prescription date to starting the drug, with 12/13 having a less than 2 week lapse. We also found that there were no patients who discontinued the drug and only one dose reduction as directed by the physician. Conclusions: The introduction of new office procedures to easily identify all patients on oral therapy and improved patient management of symptoms at home with the use of self-care guidelines, and in the office with use of ESAS contributed to greater adherence to oral chemotherapy regimens.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: <span>Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Psycho-Oncology</span>

Track

Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 31; abstr 215)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.31_suppl.215

Abstract #

215

Poster Bd #

F6

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Health-system specialty pharmacy impact on oral chemotherapy outcomes.

First Author: Tehsinabanu Sheikh

First Author: Marina D. Kaymakcalan

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Impact of medically integrated pharmacies on oral anticancer medication prescription abandonment.

First Author: Gury K. Doshi

First Author: Analia Nguyen