Clinical efficacy of accelerated partial-breast irradiation in treatment of ER-negative breast cancer: Results of a matched pair analysis.

Authors

null

Peter Y. Chen

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Royal Oak, MI

Peter Y. Chen , Jessica Wobb , Michelle Wallace , Inga S. Grills , Maha Saada Jawad , Arielle Pietron , Joshua T. Dilworth , Nayana Dekhne , Donald S. Brabbins

Organizations

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Royal Oak, MI, Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, William Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: To assess outcomes of ER-negative breast CA pts treated with APBI, a matched-pair analysis was performed to determine efficacy of APBI vs whole breast RT (WBRT) from a single institution. Methods: From over 1650 pts treated with BCT from 1980-2013, a cohort of ER[-] pts treated with APBI or WBRT were investigated. Matched-pair analysis with a 1:1 ratio paired 79 APBI with 79 WBRT pts, all ER[-] (total:158). Match criteria included follow-up (FU) > 1.0 yr, stage, & age +/- 5 yrs. Outcomes analyzed included local recurrence (LR), true recurrence/marginal miss (TRMM), regional recurrence (RR), distant metastases (DM), disease-free (DFS), cause-specific (CSS), and overall survivals (OS). Results: As for clinical-pathological traits, no significant differences were noted for age (p=0.302), T-stage (p=1.000), tumor size (p=0.721), N-stage (p=0.062), use of chemoRx (p=0.747), endocrine Rx(p=0.408) or Herceptin (p=1.00). Per ASTRO Guidelines, no differences were seen in cautionary or unsuitable [UnS] groups between APBI & WBRT (p=0.333). With a mean FU of 8.0 yrs (10.1 yrs APBI; 8.4 yrs WBRT p<0.001), no differences were seen in the 10-yr actuarial rates of LR (9.3% vs 22.1% p=0.094), RR (1.3% vs 8.1% p=0.299), DM (7.1% vs 13.0% p=0.429), DFS (83.9% vs. 72.5% p=0.214), CSS (93.5% vs. 89.0 % p=0.677), or OS (79.6% vs. 80.1% p=0.573) between APBI & WBRT. Only TRMM was significantly different (0% APBI vs 12.5% p=0.011). In stratifying patients based on ER% (0%, 1-3%, 4-8%) no outcome differences were noted. Of the 158 ER[-] pts, 124 were cautionary with similar 10-yr outcomes except for TRMM (0% APBI;WBRT 14.4% p=0.017) & CLBF (0% APBI;WBRT17.1% p=0.019). For the 34 UnS patients, no endpoint differences were seen APBI vs WBRT. But, when the entire 158 ER[-] patients were analyzed for # of UnS factors, increasing UnS factors led to significant risk of RR (p<0.001) & DM (p=0.002). Conclusions: With 10-year FU of APBI for ER[-], the clinical results were equivalent to WBRT. No differences were noted based on ER%. Increasing number of unsuitable factors had more RR and DM. Maturation of randomized trial data will be needed to provide Class I evidence for equivalence of APBI to WBRT in ER[-] patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Local/Regional Therapy, Survivorship, and Health Policy

Track

Local/Regional Therapy,Survivorship and Health Policy

Sub Track

Biology in Local/Regional Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 26; abstr 70)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.26_suppl.70

Abstract #

70

Poster Bd #

B5

Abstract Disclosures