Evaluation of an online, skill-building, group intervention for patients with cancer: Pillars4Life.

Authors

null

Jonathan David O'Donnell

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Jonathan David O'Donnell, Amy Pickar Abernethy, Greg Samsa, Tina Staley, Kristin MacDermott, Sophia Smith

Organizations

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Pillars4Life, Inc., Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Psychosocial distress is common for those with cancer; new interventions are needed. Pillars4Life is an online educational program that teaches coping skills in a group format. What is the relationship between participation in the LiveStrong-funded Pillars4Life program and personal psychosocial outcomes? Methods: This was a longitudinal observational cohort study. Cancer patients participating in the Pillars4Life program were recruited from the 17 hospitals that received the LiveStrong Community Impact Award. Consenting participants participated in 10 weekly sessions and completed electronic surveys at baseline and 3 months. Patient reported measures included: distress [Distress Thermometer (DT), Patient Care Monitor (PCM)], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9)], anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7)], posttraumatic stress [PTSD Checklist-Civilian (PCLC)], despair (PCM), fatigue [Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)], and cancer-related wellbeing [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACTG)] outcomes. Results: Patient participants (n=130) were: mean age 56±11 years; 87% female; 89% white; 61% married; 48% employed; 51% had breast cancer; and 63% were receiving treatment. Mean scores significantly improved from baseline to month 3 on all patient-reported outcome measures: DT (-0.9), PCM Distress (-3.0), PHQ9 (-2.3), GAD7 (-2.3), PCLC (-4.3), PCM Despair (-2.9), FACT-G (4.7), all p<.001; and FACIT-Fatigue (3.3, p=.001). Patients who reported distress at baseline (DT≥4; n=70) had clinically significant improvements (moderate to strong effect sizes ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 standard deviation units) in DT; PCM Distress, Quality of Life, and Despair; PHQ9; GAD7; PCLC; FACTG, among others. Conclusions: Participation in Pillars4Life was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements on key psychosocial and quality of life patient-reported outcomes measures. Importantly, distressed patients experienced meaningful improvement.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: End-of-Life Care, <span>Patient-Reported Outcomes</span>, and Survivorship

Track

Survivorship,Patient-Reported Outcomes: Mechanisms of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Early Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care

Sub Track

Survivorship

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 31; abstr 239)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.31_suppl.239

Abstract #

239

Poster Bd #

F15

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Christy Morrissey

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Reducing stress and anxiety in cancer patients with the use of virtual reality.

First Author: Zeeshan Muzammil