Marital distress (MD), quality of life, and psychological morbidity among advanced cancer patients (ACP) in phase I trials and their spousal caregivers (SC).

Authors

null

Fay J. Hlubocky

The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL

Fay J. Hlubocky , David Cella , Tamara Sher , Mark J. Ratain , Christopher Daugherty

Organizations

The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University Family Institute, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Prior research identifies marriage as a protective resource for couples during the cancer trajectory. However, the prevalence of potential MD and its effect on the quality of life (QOL) and psychological morbidity of ACP in Phase I trials has not been described. Methods: A prospective cohort of ACP enrolling in phase I trials was assessed at baseline (T1) and one month (T2) using the following measures: depression (CES-D), state-trait anxiety (STAI-S/T), quality of life/qol (FACIT-Pal), global health (SF-36), and marital satisfaction (DAS). Semi-structured interviews evaluated ACP-SC experiences re MD including: fulfillment, contentment, intimacy, conflict. Results: To date, a total of 54 married phase I ACP-SC couple dyads (n=108 subjects) were separately interviewed at T1 and T2. For the total population: median age 60y (28-78y); 50% male; 88% Ca; 68%> HS educ; 57% GI dx; 52% income <$65,000 yr. Couples were married on average for 37y (15-50y) and 18% ACPs reported this was a second marriage. At T1, 45% of ACP reported marital fulfillment; 37% reported marital contentment; 67% reported intimacy concerns; 65% reported marital conflict. For SC at T1, 31% reported marital fulfillment; 50% reported marital contentment; 74% SC reported intimacy concerns; and 79% reported marital conflict. Rates remained stable for both ACP and SC with the exception of increased self-reported marital conflict at 68% and 83% respectively at T2. At T2, ACP who reported marital conflict had higher STAI-S (33 ± 10 v 28 ±12, p=0.01) and CES-D (13 ± 12 v 11 ± 9, p=0.03). SC with self-reported marital conflict had higher STAI-S anxiety (39 ± 17 v 35 ± 13, p=0.03) at T2. In regression analyses, ACP with intimacy concerns had poorer FACIT-Pal QOL over time. Also, SC with intimacy concerns at T2 was negatively associated with SF-36 and DAS scores over time. ACP and SC qualitative inquiry re MD exposed various themes: conflicts re EOL tx/advanced directives/estate planning; lack of physical/emotional intimacy; non-existent sex life; lack of communication. Conclusions: MD is negatively associated with QOL among clinical trial subjects and SC in phase I trials.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Psychosocial and Communication Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 9578)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9578

Abstract #

9578

Poster Bd #

228

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Ronald Chow

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Outcomes of a resilient living program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

First Author: Deirdre R. Pachman