Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Steven E. Coutre , Richard R. Furman , Jeff Porter Sharman , Bruce D. Cheson , John M. Pagel , Peter Hillmen , Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos , Andrew David Zelenetz , Thomas J. Kipps , Ian Flinn , Paolo Ghia , Herbert Aaron Eradat , Thomas J. Ervin , Nicole Lamanna , Bertrand Coiffier , Andrew Pettitt , Yeonhee Kim , Thomas Michael Jahn , Susan Mary O'Brien , Michael J. Hallek
Background: Idelalisib (IDELA), an oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ, is highly active in heavily pretreated patients with CLL as single agent or combined with rituximab (R) as demonstrated in Phase 1 trials. Methods: A Phase 3 study evaluated IDELA+R vs placebo (PBO)+R in pts with CLL requiring therapy after progression <24 mos since completion of last therapy and considered unfit to receive cytotoxic therapy. Primary endpoint PFS was assessed by IRC and standard criteria (Hallek 2008/2012, Cheson 2012). After progression, pts could enroll into a blinded extension study to receive IDELA at 150 mg BID (prior PBO+R) or 300 mg BID (prior IDELA+R). The first interim analysis (Furman et al, 2014) led to a decision of early stop for overwhelming efficacy. Results: 220 pts (110/group) with median age of 71 yrs (78% ≥65 yrs), median time since diagnosis of 8.5 yrs, and median number of 3 prior therapies (range: 1-12) were randomized. 44% of pts had del17p/TP53 mutation, 84% had unmutated IGHV. Table 1 summarizes efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Similar to the first interim analysis, IDELA+R demonstrated significant improvement in PFS, ORR, and LNR compared to control, with acceptable safety. OS of pts on IDELA+R remains superior, including pts that crossed over into the extension study. Clinical trial information: NCT01539512.
Efficacy |
Group |
Stats |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
IDELA+R |
PBO+R |
|||
PFS, all | Median | NR | 5.5 mos | HR=0.18 95% CI: 0.10-0.32 p<0.0001 |
At 24 wks | ||||
90% | 50% | - | ||
Overall response rate, all | 75% | 15% | OR=17.3 p<0.0001 |
|
Lymph node response rate, all | 92% | 6% | OR=165.5 p<0.0001 |
|
Overall survival (incl. extension study) |
Median | NR | NR | HR=0.28 95% CI: 0.11-0.69 p=0.003 |
At 24 wks | ||||
96% | 86% | - | ||
Safety | Group (any Grade/Grade ≥3, %) | |||
Category | Term | IDELA+R | PBO+R | |
AEs in ≥20% of pts | Any AE | 96/64 | 98/52 | |
Pyrexia | 35/3 | 17/1 | ||
Fatigue | 26/5 | 28/3 | ||
Nausea | 26/0 | 21/0 | ||
Chills | 21/2 | 16/0 | ||
Infusion-related reaction | 19/0 | 30/4 | ||
Cough | 17/1 | 28/2 | ||
Select AEs | Diarrhea* | 19/4 | 15/0 | |
Bleeding** | 14/1 | 19/1 | ||
Pneumonia | 10/8 | 13/9 | ||
Rash | 10/1 | 5/0 | ||
Pneumonitis | 6/4 | 1/1 | ||
Colitis* | 5/3 | 1/0 | ||
Select labs | ALT elevation | 35/8 | 10/1 | |
Creatinine increased | 13/0 | 9/1 | ||
Neutropenia | 60/37 | 51/27 | ||
Anemia | 29/7 | 32/17 | ||
Thrombocytopenia | 19/11 | 32/18 |
*3/5 pts w/colitis on IDELA+R also reported diarrhea; **Includes 16 preferred terms.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jason Westin
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Laurie Helen Sehn
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Wojciech Jurczak
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nancy L. Bartlett