Clinicopathologic features of advanced RET fusion-positive lung cancers and outcomes in comparison to other fusion-positive lung cancers.

Authors

Alexander Drilon

Alexander E. Drilon

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Alexander E. Drilon , Matthew David Hellmann , Lu Wang , Eun Jung Cho , Marc Ladanyi , Naiyer A. Rizvi

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Recurrent gene rearrangements are important drivers of lung cancer growth. While RET fusions are recognized as actionable targets, the clinicopathologic features of these drivers in advanced (stage IIIB/IV) disease and survival in comparison to ALK and ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancers are less well-characterized. Methods: A FISH study using dual-color break-apart probes was performed to screen for RET fusions in patients (pts) with advanced lung ADCs that tested negative for mutations in EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MAP2K1, ERBB2, PIK3CA, or AKT, and fusions of ALK or ROS1. In pts with sufficient tissue, fusion partners were identified (RT-PCR/next-generation sequencing). Pathologic review of available tumor specimens and assessment of radiographic response via RECIST v1.1 were conducted. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Comparisons to control groups of ALK and ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancers were performed (Mantel-Haenszel/log rank tests). Results: 17% (n=18/104, 95%CI 9-22%) of tumors from screened pts harbored a RET fusion (56% male, median age 61). Majority of pts had no history of chest RT [89%, n=16] and were never smokers [72% (n=13) <1, 22% (n=4) 1-15, and 6% (n=1) >15 pack-years]. In 8 pts with sufficient tissue, known upstream partners were identified in 7 pts (NCOA4, TRIM33, 6 KIF5B). An upstream partner not previously described in lung cancers (CLIP1) was found. Morphology in surgical specimens (n=8) was as follows: 63% (n=5) predominantly solid, 25% (n=2) predominantly cribriform, 13% (n=1) predominantly papillary. OS of RET (n=18) vs ALK (n=45; HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.34-2.08, p=0.71) and ROS1 (n=10; HR 1.59, 95%CI 0.34-7.31, p=0.55) fusion-positive lung cancers was similar. In patients who received first-line chemotherapy, PFS of RET (n=12) vs ALK (n=22; HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.25-1.13, p=0.10) and ROS1 (n=8; HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.34-4.17, p-0.78) fusion-positive lung cancers was similar. Conclusions: Advanced RET fusion-positive lung cancers represent a distinct group of tumors with clinical outcomes comparable to ALK and ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancers.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer - Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 8076)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.8076

Abstract #

8076

Poster Bd #

257

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Circulating tumor DNA–based genomic landscape of KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

First Author: Brendon Fusco

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Driver coexistence characteristics of ALK-fusion in Chinese patients with lung cancer.

First Author: Min Gao

First Author: Alissa Jamie Cooper