The safety and tolerability of veliparib (V) plus capecitabine (C) and radiation (RT) in subjects with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Results of a phase 1b study.

Authors

null

Brian G. Czito

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Brian G. Czito , Mary Frances Mulcahy , William R. Schelman , Houman Vaghefi , Gayle S. Jameson , Angela Deluca , Hao Xiong , Wijith Munasinghe , Matthew W. Dudley , Kyle D. Holen , Michael Michael

Organizations

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, Indiana University Health, Goshen Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, IN, Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center at Scottsdale Healthcare/TGen, Scottsdale, AZ, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Medicine, Melbourne, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Patients (pts) with LARC treated with neoadjuvant RT/C and then surgery have significant relapse rates with low rates of complete response. V is a potent, orally bioavailable PARP inhibitor that has been shown to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and RT in preclinical models. This study sought to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RPTD) as well as to assess safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary activity of V + RT/C in pts with LARC. Methods: Pts with stage II-III rectal cancer received RT (50.4Gy/1.8Gy/fraction) with C (825 mg/m2BID) five days per week (W) for 5.5W. Dosing of V (BID, 20mg-400mg) continued from W1D2 to 2 days past RT. Pts underwent surgery 5-10W following RT. Assessments include identification of RPTD with the Exposure Adjusted Continual Reassessment Method, adverse events (AEs), PK, and pathological response: no disease present on pathologic review (ypCR), microscopic disease only (yCR), and tumor downstaging. Results: As of Dec 8, 2013, 18 pts have been enrolled, 12/6 male/female, median age 55 yrs; 1 pt discontinued due to an AE. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (>20% pts, n ≥ 4) were diarrhea (39%), nausea (39%), fatigue (33%), radiation skin injury (33%), dysuria (22%), and constipation (22%). One Grade 3/4 event of diarrhea and one post-operative event of anastomosis dehiscence were deemed at least possibly related to V. One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at 70mg BID V (radiation skin injury requiring dose interruption); 1 pt at 400 mg BID described ongoing intolerable nausea not meeting the criteria of a DLT. The RPTD is 400 mg V in combination with RT/C. PK results from 16 pts suggest that V PK was approximately dose proportional when administered with RT/C and that V had no effect on the PK of C. To date, 11/15 (73%) pts have been downstaged post-surgery; with 4/16 (25%) ypCR and 4/16 (25%) yCR. Conclusions: V at 400 mg in combination with RT/C has an acceptable safety profile, and the combination will move forward in an expanded cohort to better define toxicity and efficacy. Escalations of V resulted in approximately dose proportional increases in the V PK with no clear effect on C PK. Clinical trial information: NCT01589419.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01589419

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 3634)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3634

Abstract #

3634

Poster Bd #

97

Abstract Disclosures